This Union is dear to me as a Union of fraternal states. It
would lose its value to me if I had to regard it as a Union
held together by physical force. I would be happy to know that
every state now felt that fraternity which made this Union
possible; and if that evidence could go out, if evidence
satisfactory to the people of the South could be given, that
_that_ feeling existed in the hearts of the Northern people,
you might burn your statute books and we would cling to the
Union still. But it is because of their conviction that
hostility and not fraternity now exists in the hearts of the
Northern people, that they are looking to their reserved rights
and to their independent powers for their own protection. If
there be any good, then, which we can do, it is by sending
evidence to them of that which I fear does not exist--the
purpose in your constituents to fulfill in the spirit of
justice and fraternity all their constitutional obligations. If
you can submit to them that evidence, I feel confidence that
with the evidence that aggression is henceforth to cease, will
terminate all the measures for defense. Upon you of the
majority section it depends to restore peace and perpetuate the
Union of equal states; upon us of the minority section rests
the duty to maintain our equality and community rights; and the
means in one case or the other must be such as each can
control.[40]
This was the explicit confirmation of what Lincoln had said, in his
Cooper Institute speech a year earlier, was the chief difficulty of the
North: "We must not only let them (the South) alone, but we must somehow
convince them that we do let them alone."
The best speech made on the Republican side of the chamber during this
momentous session of Congress was made by Trumbull on the night of March
2. It was a speech adverse to the Crittenden Compromise, and was a reply
to Crittenden's final speech in support of it. This measure was a joint
resolution proposing certain amendments to the Constitution, the first
of which proposed to apply the old Missouri Compromise line, of 36° 30'
north latitude, to all the remaining territory of the United States, so
that in all territory north of it, then owned or thereafter acquired,
slavery should be prohibited, and that in all south of it, then owned or
thereafter acquired, slavery should be recognized as existing, and that
the right of property in slaves there should be protected by Federal
law. It was offered on the 18th of December, 1860, and debated till the
2d of March following, when it was defeated by yeas 19, nays 20, all the
Republicans voting against it except Seward, who did not vote and was
not paired.[41]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account