Again, sir, the Senator talks of the rights of the States to
the common territories. The territories do not belong to the
States; they are the property of the General Government; and
the state of Kentucky has no more right in a territory than has
the city of Washington, or any county in the state of Maryland.
As a state, Kentucky has no right in a territory, nor has
Illinois; but the territories belong to the Federal government,
and are disposed of to the citizens of the United States,
without regard to locality.
But, sir, I propose to inquire what it is that has brought the
country to its present condition; what it is that has
occasioned this disruption, this revolution in a portion of the
country. Many years ago an attempt was made in the state of
South Carolina to disrupt this Government, at that time on
account of the revenue system. It failed. The disunionists of
1832 were put down by General Jackson; and from that day to
this there have been secessionists _per se_, men who have been
struggling continuously and persistently to propagate their
doctrine wherever they could find followers; and, I am sorry to
say, they seem to have impressed the public mind of the South,
to a great extent, with their notions. In 1850, the effort to
break up the Government was renewed. It was then settled by
what were known as the compromise measures of that year. The
great men of that day--Clay, Webster, Cass, and others--took
part in that settlement, and it was then supposed that the
settlement would be permanent. The controversy of 1850 was not
in regard to a tariff, but in regard to the negro question; the
very question which General Jackson had prophesied, in the
nullification times, would be the one upon which the next
attempt would be made to destroy the Government. After a long
struggle, the compromise measures of 1850 were passed. Quiet
was given to the country; all parties in all sections of the
country acquiesced in the settlement then made. Resolutions
were offered in this body denouncing any person who should
attempt again to introduce the question of slavery into
Congress. Speeches were made, in which Senators declared that
they would never again speak upon the subject in the Congress
of the United States. It was said that the slavery question was
forever removed from the halls of Congress, and we then
supposed that the country would continue quiet on this exciting
subject. But, sir, in 1854, notwithstanding the pledges which
had been given in 1850, notwithstanding the quiet of the
country, when no man was agitating the slavery question; when
no petitions came from the states, counties, cities, or towns,
from villages or individuals, asking a disturbance of former
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account