I think, then, sir, that none of these compromises will amount
to anything; but still I am willing to do this, and I think if
there is any difficulty it may be settled in this way: three of
the states of this Union, the state of Kentucky, the state of
New Jersey, and the State of Illinois, have called upon
Congress to call a convention of all the states for the purpose
of proposing amendments to the Constitution. I do not think the
Constitution needs amendment. In my judgment, the Constitution
as it is, is worthy to be lived up to and supported. I doubt if
we shall better it; but out of deference to those states, one
of which is my own state, I am willing to vote for the
resolution which has been introduced into this body
recommending to the various states to take into consideration
this proposition of calling a convention, in order to make such
amendments as may be deemed necessary by the states themselves
to this instrument. So far, I am willing to go. Would it not
have been better for the seceding states to have done that? Why
did they not propose, instead of attempting hastily to break up
the Government and seizing its public property, to call a
convention, in the constitutional form, of the various states,
and if the Federal Constitution needed amendment, amend it in
that way. No such proposition came from them; but Kentucky has
made the proposition for a convention, and I am willing to meet
her in the spirit in which it is made, and am ready, for one,
and would be glad if we could all unitedly pass the resolution
suggesting to the states to call a convention to make any and
all amendments to the Constitution which the exigencies of the
times may require.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account