I have been to Mobile, spent a week there, have traveled around
in this state, talked much with friend and enemy, and I
unhesitatingly say that our President has been going too fast.
I am told by all Union men that after the surrender of the
rebel armies the men returned perfectly quiet, came to Southern
and Northern Union men, saying, "We don't know what is expected
of us by the Government, but one thing is certain, we are tired
of war and desire above all things to return to the quiet
pursuits of life and try to mend our fortune as best we can,
and cultivate a friendly feeling with all parts of the country
once more; now tell us how to do this." Soon, however, to their
surprise they found that the control of everything was to be
again put in their hands, and at once they became insolent,
abused the Government openly, and openly declared that Union
men and Yankees must leave as soon as the military is
withdrawn. Had they been given to understand that the
Government was going to continue to govern and control, and
that Union men alone would be trusted with the management of
affairs, these people would have been entirely satisfied, glad
to escape with their lives, and would at once have adapted
themselves to circumstances. Now they are drunk with power,
ruling and abusing every loyal man, white and black.
Per contra, Dr. C. H. Ray wrote, under date September 29, 1865, on the
subject of Reconstruction:
What are our Republican papers thinking of when they make war
upon the President as they are now doing? I see that there is
hardly one to stand up in his defense, and that he will be
fought out of our ranks into the arms of the Democracy. I do
not see that he is so guilty as he is said to be, and for one I
cannot join the cry against him. What do his assailants
expect--to carry the country on the Massachusetts idea of negro
suffrage, female suffrage, confiscation, and hanging? If so,
they will drive all moderate men out of the party and the
remainder straight to perdition.
Only five Northern States at this time allowed negroes to vote at
elections, and one of these (New York) required a property qualification
from blacks but not from whites. The state of Illinois had an unrepealed
black code similar to that of Kentucky, and had added to it, as lately
as 1853, a law for imprisoning any black or mulatto person brought into,
or coming into, the state, for the purpose of residing there, whether
free or otherwise. Some litigation for the enforcement of this act was
begun in Cass County in 1863, while the Civil War was in progress.[78]
FOOTNOTES:
[76] _Life of Garrison_, by his sons, IV, 123.
[77] Grant's testimony before the House Committee on the Judiciary, July
18, 1867. McPherson, p. 303.
[78] _Journal_ of the Illinois State Historical Society, vol. IV, no. 4.
CHAPTER XVI
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account