different from the settlement of Dred Scott's claim, and that this aim
was political, is now sufficiently established. It is also established
that Dred Scott never took any steps consciously to secure freedom, but
that the action was brought in his name by some speculating lawyers in
St. Louis to secure damages or wages from the widow of Scott's master,
Dr. Emerson.[33] One additional fact is supplied by a letter in the
Trumbull correspondence, showing how the money was collected to pay the
plaintiff's court costs.
G. Bailey, Washington, May 12, 1857, writes, that when the case
of Dred Scott was first brought to the notice of Montgomery
Blair, he applied to him (Bailey) to know what to do. Blair
said he would freely give his services without charge if Bailey
would see to the necessary expenses of the case. Not having an
opportunity to confer with friends, Bailey replied that he
would become responsible. He had no doubt the necessary money
could be raised. On this assurance he proceeded, the case was
tried, and the result was before the country. Mr. Blair had
just rendered the bill of costs: $63.18 for writ of error and
$91.50 for printing briefs; total, $154.68. "May I be so bold,
my dear sir, as to ask you to contribute two dollars toward the
payment of this bill. I am now writing to seventy-five of the
Rep. Members of the late Congress, and if they will answer me
promptly, each enclosing the quota named, I can discharge the
bill by myself paying a double share."
_Mem._: $2 sent by Trumbull June 20th, '57.
The debate in the Senate on the Lecompton Bill continued till March 23.
The best speech on the Republican side was made by Fessenden, of Maine,
than whom a more consummate debater or more knightly character and
presence has not graced the Senate chamber in my time, if ever. On the
administration side the laboring oar was taken by Toombs, who spoke with
more truculence than he had shown in the Thirty-fourth Congress.
Jefferson Davis, who had been returned to the Senate after serving as
Secretary of War under Pierce, bore himself in this debate with decorum
and moderation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account