The life of Midhat Pasha; a record of his services, political reforms, banishment, and judicial murderAli Haydar Mithat
History
The life of Midhat Pasha; a record of his services, political reforms, banishment, and judicial murder
Ali Haydar Mithat
Midhat Paşa, 1822-1884; Statesmen -- Turkey -- Biography; Turkey -- History -- 19th century
“The first formality was the proving of the prisoners’ identity,
and immediately thereafter the indictment was read by three of the
prosecutors, which may be briefly stated as follows:—A few days
after the dethronement of Abdul Aziz, Mahmoud Damad, and Nouri
Damad, engaged two professional wrestlers and a Palace watchman
to assassinate their ex‐Sovereign, promising them £100 each and a
monthly pension of three pounds, as appears from the accounts of
the Civil Lists. The crime was committed with the assistance of the
Chamberlain, Fahri Bey, while Ali and Nedjib Beys, who had introduced
the assassins into the Palace, mounted guard with drawn swords at the
door of the room. As there was at that time a Supreme Commission,
composed of Mehmed Ruchdi, Midhat, Hussein Avni, the Sheik‐ul‐Islam,
and Mahmoud Damad, and as no important orders could be given without
the concurrence of this Commission, it may be assumed that all its
members must have been _cognizant_ of Mahmoud and Nouri’s criminal
proceedings, and it is for this reason that Midhat is among the
accused.
“When the indictment setting forth this theory had been read, the
President, in a quiet and dignified manner, began to question the
prisoners. The first called upon to state what he knew, was Mustapha,
the wrestler, a man of ordinary size and not presenting any signs
of abnormal muscular development. His face was of a common type and
betrayed no symptoms of emotion as he related, in plain, unvarnished
terms, how he had cut open the ex‐Sultan’s veins with a knife
given to him for the purpose by Mahmoud Damad. His description,
accompanied by slight and significant gestures, was brutally
graphic, and made a strong impression on the spectators, more than
one of the older men in the audience giving vent to their feelings
of horror by audible exclamations. Mustapha’s account was fully
confirmed by Hadji Mehmed Pasha, who declared that together with
the Chamberlain Fahri Bey and Djezairli, he had hold of Abdul Aziz
whilst the crime was being perpetrated. Djezairli, who had made a
full confession in his preliminary examination, was then questioned,
and retracted what he had previously said. Fahri Bey, a young man,
with long fair moustache, delicately‐cut effeminate features,
and of tall and slender build, was next examined, and denied the
statements of the wrestler and his companion. In a tremulous tone,
which gathered firmness as he proceeded, he described, from his
personal observation, the mental condition of Abdul Aziz after his
dethronement, and obstinately insisted that the dethroned monarch
had committed suicide. The other prisoners, without endeavouring to
explain how the Sultan’s death occurred, successively maintained
their own innocence, and found more or less plausible answers for all
the questions put to them by the judges. Mahmoud Damad Pasha, a tall
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account