The life of Midhat Pasha; a record of his services, political reforms, banishment, and judicial murderAli Haydar Mithat
History
The life of Midhat Pasha; a record of his services, political reforms, banishment, and judicial murder
Ali Haydar Mithat
Midhat Paşa, 1822-1884; Statesmen -- Turkey -- Biography; Turkey -- History -- 19th century
In spite of these efforts to
supplement defective legal evidence, many people, and among them the
mother of Abdul Aziz, and some of the doctors who examined his body,
still hold to the conviction that there was no assassination and
that Abdul Aziz committed suicide. Without endorsing this opinion, I
can confidently assert that the trial has by no means cleared up the
mystery. The semi‐official announcements that the _Valide Sultana has
thanked the Sultan for having brought the assassins to justice are
untrue, for she has all through the inquiry obstinately maintained
that her son perished by his own hand, and that she was partly to
blame for having given him the famous scissors_.”
“I am now in a position to explain why the prosecution showed such
anxiety to get Midhat condemned, and employed such unjustifiable
means for this purpose. It may be remembered that some months ago the
Sultan was greatly alarmed by a revolutionary propaganda, of which
the chief instigator was believed to be the ex‐Khedive. A judicial
functionary, who has since taken a prominent part in the trial,
was ordered to make an inquiry, and came to the conclusion that
Midhat was implicated in the propaganda. The conclusion was probably
erroneous, but it made a strong impression on the Sultan’s mind, and
from that moment Midhat’s fate was decided. As no legal proofs of his
complicity in the seditious agitation could be produced, other means
had to be employed for getting rid of him, and the regicide inquiry
was used for this purpose.”
_“Times,” 11th July 1881._—“_Constantinople, 10th July._—During
the last few days representations have been twice made to the
Sultan by the British Ambassador concerning the State trial. It is
believed at the Palace that Lord Dufferin acted on the first occasion
spontaneously, and on the second occasion by the express orders of
Lord Granville. The later communication is said to be couched in
strong terms, urging His Majesty for his own sake to refrain from
carrying out the sentence of the tribunal. The Sultan has received
also a telegram from the Ottoman Embassy in London, in which Musurus
Pasha describes the unfavourable impression produced by the trial in
England, and implores His Majesty to prevent at least the capital
punishment being inflicted.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account