The life of Midhat Pasha; a record of his services, political reforms, banishment, and judicial murderAli Haydar Mithat
History
The life of Midhat Pasha; a record of his services, political reforms, banishment, and judicial murder
Ali Haydar Mithat
Midhat Paşa, 1822-1884; Statesmen -- Turkey -- Biography; Turkey -- History -- 19th century
“Mr J. COWEN said he was sure the House had listened with
satisfaction to the humane and generous observations of the Prime
Minister. He trusted his hon. friend, the Member for Wicklow, having
elicited such an expression of opinion, would be content, and not
push his motion to a division. He entirely sympathised with him
in the course he had pursued. It was desirable that the British
Parliament should have an opportunity of recording its opinion of the
very exceptional proceedings under the name of law that had recently
taken place at Constantinople. Midhat Pasha was a distinguished
Turkish Pasha. He had served his country ably and honourably in the
highest offices the Sultan could confer. He had proved himself to
be a friend of England and of progressive principles. He (Mr Cowen)
had the privilege of his acquaintance, and he could confirm the
high character that the hon. Member for Wicklow had given him. He
recognised the delicacy of the position, and he could appreciate the
difficulties that the Premier had referred to. To interfere with the
action of the Turkish Courts, however they were constituted, might
be regarded as trenching upon the freedom of an independent State.
If representations were made in a too emphatic way, they might be
resented by the Sultan, and have the very opposite effect than was
designed. This was a possibility which they should all bear in mind,
and of which the Government, no doubt, were conscious. They should
remember also that it was impossible for the House to review the
proceedings of the Constantinople tribunal. They might have their
opinions; but they were not, and could not, be informed of all the
details. But still, admitting all this, the English Government had
on other occasions interceded with foreign rulers on behalf of
fallen statesmen or popular leaders. There were many instances in
history where there had been such friendly interference; and they
had, therefore, the warrant of precedent for doing what was now
suggested. He trusted that the Government would—with all the energy
that they felt themselves justified in using, but at the same time,
with the necessary friendliness—intercede on behalf of Midhat
Pasha. The Prime Minister had said that instructions to that effect
would be sent to Lord Dufferin, and the House and the country would
feel satisfied that any appeal by him would be supported by a man
of great ability, high character, and of generous spirit. Having
called attention to the subject and made this representation, he
would advise that the matter be allowed to rest in the hands of Her
Majesty’s Government.
“Mr M’COAN asked leave to withdraw the motion.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account