The life of Midhat Pasha; a record of his services, political reforms, banishment, and judicial murderAli Haydar Mithat
History
The life of Midhat Pasha; a record of his services, political reforms, banishment, and judicial murder
Ali Haydar Mithat
Midhat Paşa, 1822-1884; Statesmen -- Turkey -- Biography; Turkey -- History -- 19th century
This incident did not facilitate Sir H. Elliot’s task. On the day
following the 5th October, Lord Derby instructs Sir H. Elliot to
inform the Porte that it is intended that the armistice should be
followed by a Conference, and that if an armistice for not less than
a month is not granted, the Ambassador was to quit Constantinople and
leave Turkey to its fate.[47]
On the 8th October, the Porte asks the very pertinent question
whether, in the event of the conditions being accepted, a Conference
would still be proposed.[48] No answer seems ever to have been given
to this important question.
The Turkish Ministers now submitted the question of the armistice
to a Grand Council, which acceded to it for five months.[49] On the
13th October, in a long telegram to Musurus Pasha, the Porte makes a
last despairing attempt to stay the decision for a Conference, which
it says “will at least give rise to the danger of certain impulses
on which head we have the right to be anxious, and which in reality
would be of no use. The five months’ armistice would leave ample time
for the Powers to exchange explanations and observations without
any Conference. During this time, the work of internal reform would
go on, and Europe would have the opportunity of being edified as to
the serious and practical character of the promises of the Imperial
Government,” and concluded by saying, referring evidently to the
negotiations with Sir H. Elliot, “I hope His Lordship will agree
with us in preventing the question, _which was just beginning to
look brighter_, thanks to so many sacrifices and efforts, from being
turned into a path of new difficulties and perils.”[50]
If it had not been for the Soumarakoff Mission, and the scare it
created in the Foreign Office, it would have been an inexplicable
mystery why Lord Derby, abandoning negotiations carried on by Sir H.
Elliot, which “were just beginning to look brighter,” should have
hurriedly fathered this proposal of a Conference. If the Soumarakoff
Mission was only intended to secure this point, it was most eminently
successful. Anyway, from this time forth, Lord Derby stuck grimly
to a Conference. Without a Conference there was no salvation. The
question, however, of the duration of the armistice was not yet
settled, and as England, having accepted six months, could not
recant, General Ignatieff arrived from Livadia to settle it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account