The life of Midhat Pasha; a record of his services, political reforms, banishment, and judicial murderAli Haydar Mithat
History
The life of Midhat Pasha; a record of his services, political reforms, banishment, and judicial murder
Ali Haydar Mithat
Midhat Paşa, 1822-1884; Statesmen -- Turkey -- Biography; Turkey -- History -- 19th century
It would be difficult to carry intentional bad faith further. All
this time, notes and memorandums were flying about the Chancelleries
of Europe to force the Porte to give guarantees for suppressing
an insurrection which was being organised and fed by bands “all
well‐armed” across a friendly frontier, its suppression being thus
rendered materially impossible. As well might one try to extinguish
a conflagration, over an unlimited area, that was being continually
fed by petroleum springs, the sources of which could not be got
at. Nor let it be supposed that to guard such a line of frontier
was impossible. The rebels had it all their own way. And so had
the Diplomatists of the “Allied Courts of Berlin, Vienna, and St
Petersburg.” Russian Committees were joining their efforts to
Austrian.
On the 14th February 1876, Sir H. Elliot writes to Lord Derby: “The
accounts of the encouragement given to the insurgents at Ragusa
greatly exceeds all that I was prepared for. The Russian Consulate is
the open resort of the insurgent chiefs; their correspondence is sent
to the Consul, who is a party to all their projects, and associates
himself intimately with them. He does not appear to make any attempt
to conceal the part he is playing, for on the occasion of the death
of the chief Maxima, in one of the late encounters, the Russian flag
at the Consulate was hoisted at half‐mast, and M. Jomini himself
joined the funeral procession.
“Some of the wounded when asked why they continue the struggle when
the Porte is ready to grant all their demands, have answered plainly
that they are bound to go on as long as they are told by Russia to do
so. The assurances given at St Petersburg of the wish of the Imperial
Government that the insurgents would lay down their arms, must
naturally go for nothing as long as its official Representative, with
whom they are in communication, encourages them to go on.”[72] Pretty
plain speaking this! and Austria that continued the “exequatur” to
a foreign Consul, acting thus on its territory towards a friendly
Power. So gross and palpable was this assistance given by Austria
to the insurgents, whilst pretending all the time to be so keenly
anxious for its suppression, that Lord Derby thought it necessary
on the 10th March 1876, to give the following instructions to Sir
A. Buchanan, the English Ambassador at Vienna: “I have to inform
Your Excellency that it has come to the knowledge of Her Majesty’s
Government, through Her Majesty’s Ambassador at Constantinople,
that the Porte had received information that a severe fight took
place on the Dalmatian frontier on the 4th inst., and that on the
following day, the combat was renewed by a force said to be _700
strong, who came from Austrian territory with large supplies of
ammunition, and that this having occurred so immediately after the
assurances of the Austro‐Hungarian Government that their frontier
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account