The life of Midhat Pasha; a record of his services, political reforms, banishment, and judicial murderAli Haydar Mithat
History
The life of Midhat Pasha; a record of his services, political reforms, banishment, and judicial murder
Ali Haydar Mithat
Midhat Paşa, 1822-1884; Statesmen -- Turkey -- Biography; Turkey -- History -- 19th century
In the month of May we arrived at another stage of the business. It
is time that diplomacy should register another point of “terrain
acquis.” On the 4th May 1876 Lord Derby, writing to Sir A. Buchanan,
says: “The Austrian Ambassador called upon me this afternoon and
placed in my hands for perusal a despatch which he had received from
his Government. The purport of the despatch was to state that there
is _an entire agreement between the Governments of Austria, Germany
and Russia as to affairs in the East_, and that any reports that may
have been circulated to the contrary are simple inventions.”[77]
The purport of making this communication could be no other than a
warning to all whom it may concern, that they could join or not
join the “European Concert,” as they thought proper. It would make
no difference to the European Concert. It was a notice certainly
calculated to open the eyes, even of the blind, to what was going on.
As the fact of armed bands could not be disputed, it was obviously
the interest of Austria to endeavour to throw the blame on others,
Montenegro and Servia especially. We shall come to these little
States later, but _à propos_ of shifting the blame on Servia, there
is a very significant despatch from Consul‐General White, dated
Belgrade, 28th April 1876. “The Prince (of Servia) takes no pains to
conceal that, more than ever, he considers a collision with the Porte
as within the range of possibilities; but he continues to disclaim at
the same time any intention to act as the aggressor. He pointed out
to me the other day that the portion of Bosnia which is conterminous
to Servia has been entirely free from armed bands since last
November, when the Papas Zarko was repulsed into Servia, _whilst the
insurgents who had within the last few weeks made their appearance
on the river Unna between Bihatch, Novi and Kostainitza, were all in
proximity to the Austrian frontier_, and he defied anyone to show
that Servia had been instrumental in fostering insurrection in that
department of Bosnia, though he added that such an accusation had
been made somewhere, evidently alluding to Austrian Authorities.”[78]
The explanation of these apparent mysteries was really simple enough.
Servia was reserving herself for Bulgaria, which was within the
sphere of her action, as she herself was within the orbit of Russia’s
influence, and she had no intention of playing Austria’s game for
Austria’s sole benefit.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account