The life of Midhat Pasha; a record of his services, political reforms, banishment, and judicial murderAli Haydar Mithat
History
The life of Midhat Pasha; a record of his services, political reforms, banishment, and judicial murder
Ali Haydar Mithat
Midhat Paşa, 1822-1884; Statesmen -- Turkey -- Biography; Turkey -- History -- 19th century
As the active and effective action of Montenegro in the insurrection
was a secret to none in Europe, and as Russia exclusively pulled
the strings which moved its prince, it was obvious that Russia was
at the bottom of the Herzegovinian insurrection which Austria was
doing all she could to assist the Porte in suppressing—_quod erat
demonstrandum_. Now, there can be no doubt that Russia had for a
very long time past preponderating influence in the Black Mountains,
and that during the whole period that Austria followed what we have
called her “normal policy” with respect to the Ottoman Empire, the
influence of Russia over Montenegro was exclusive of any other
followed in the nature of things; but Consul‐General White, at any
rate, knew better than to suppose that this meant that no steps
had been taken by Austria (and the nature of the steps is evident)
to acquire that influence over the prince that the “new policy” of
Austria rendered desirable and necessary. In a despatch of the 25th
of February 1876, Consul‐General White, writing from Belgrade to
Sir H. Elliot, says: “I beg to inform Your Excellency that I have
been assured, from a source which I have hitherto found reliable,
that the chief reason that has prompted Prince Milan to assume a
bolder and quasi‐martial attitude is the growing suspicion in his
mind that a bait in the shape of an accession of territory was about
to be offered by Austria on behalf of the Porte to the Prince of
Montenegro. This opinion is strongly entertained here by persons _who
are supposed to be well acquainted with the nature of the relations
which have existed during the last two years between the Court of
Vienna and that Prince_.”[83]
Not only did money pour into the principality, and arms, munitions
and military science, as we shall presently see, were lavishly
provided to these interesting mountaineers, but when the conditions
of peace between Servia and Montenegro on one side, and the Porte
on the other, came to be discussed (in the month of August 1876),
Austria, who opposed the claim for any accession of territory to
Servia, advocated a considerable extension for Montenegro. There can
be slight doubt that this was one of the conditions of the bargain
arranged “during the last two years between the Courts of Vienna and
that Prince.” It is, of course, a noteworthy coincidence that the two
years mentioned at the beginning of these intimate relations brings
us exactly to the date when Count Andrassy became Chancellor of the
Austro‐Hungarian Empire.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account