The life of Midhat Pasha; a record of his services, political reforms, banishment, and judicial murderAli Haydar Mithat
History
The life of Midhat Pasha; a record of his services, political reforms, banishment, and judicial murder
Ali Haydar Mithat
Midhat Paşa, 1822-1884; Statesmen -- Turkey -- Biography; Turkey -- History -- 19th century
“MY LORD,—Midhat Pasha has been appointed Grand Vizier in the place
of Mehemet Rushdi Pasha. The importance of this appointment at this
moment is very great. Midhat Pasha is beyond question the most
energetic and liberal of the Turkish statesmen, and a man of action,
although his decisions are sometimes hasty.
“He has always advocated the equality of Mussulmans and Christians,
and wishes for a constitutional control over the power of the Grand
Vizier as well as of the Sultan. He is opposed to centralisation,
and in favour of giving the provincial populations much control over
their local affairs.
“He has at times spoken strongly to me against the grant of special
institution in the Slav Provinces; but he is a man who listens to
argument, and may, perhaps, be brought to see the necessity of it
under the present circumstances.
“He is disliked by the old Mussulman party, but is regarded as the
hope of the Mussulman reformers and of the Christians.
“He used formerly always to wish to follow the advice of Her
Majesty’s Government, but I am not aware what his feelings towards
England are at this moment.[13]
“I have....
“HENRY ELLIOT.”
Midhat pointed out to the Sultan, in a letter addressed to Saïd, the
danger of the delay and procrastination that would be caused by too
prolonged discussion on the text of the Constitution; further, that
the text which had been submitted to the Sultan was such as had been
decided upon by the Commission appointed by His Majesty himself, and
that that text, after having been submitted to His Majesty as it came
from the hands of the Commission, was now, together with His Majesty’s
observations on it, being considered by the Ministers as a final
stage, requiring at most three or four days’ deliberation, and that
any longer delay before its actual promulgation would assuredly raise
in the minds of the friendly Powers a doubt as to the sincerity of the
Turkish Government in the work of the reform; and he insisted, finally,
that, in order to convince them of this sincerity, it was essentially
desirable that the promulgation of the Constitution should take place
before the date fixed for the assembly of the Conference.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account