Bracciolini, Poggio, 1380-1459; Italy -- History -- 1268-1492
It has been already observed, that from the tenor of Poggio’s answer
to the complimentary letter of the duke of Milan, he appears not to
have given implicit credit to that prince’s professions of friendship
for the Florentine republic, and that he evidently expected that
the restless ambition of Filippo would again kindle the flames of
war. Events justified his prognostications. In the year 1439, the
administrators of the Tuscan government were so much alarmed by the
success of Piccinino, who had invaded the Venetian territories at the
head of the Milanese army, that they renewed their alliance with their
ancient friends, to whose assistance they sent a considerable body
of troops, under the command of Francesco Sforza. The duke of Milan,
with the view of compelling the Tuscans to withdraw their forces from
Lombardy, directed Piccinino to make an incursion into the territories
of Florence. Piccinino accordingly marched through Romagna, and made
himself master of several places in the district of Casentino. The duke
of Milan expected to have derived considerable assistance in the invasion
of the Tuscan territories from Vitelleschi, with whom he had for some
time carried on a secret correspondence, and who had, through hatred of
the Florentines, engaged to support Piccinino with a powerful body of
troops. But the secrecy with which this intrigue had been conducted did
not elude the vigilance of the administrators of the Tuscan government.
They fortunately intercepted certain letters addressed by the duke to
Vitelleschi, which revealed the particulars of the conspiracy. These
letters they communicated to the pontiff, who gave immediate orders for
the arrest of the perfidious patriarch. As Vitelleschi was then at Rome,
the execution of this commission was entrusted to Antonio Rido, the
commandant of the castle of St. Angelo. According to the instructions of
Eugenius, Vitelleschi was suddenly surrounded by a troop of horse, as he
was passing the bridge of St. Angelo, on his way to join the forces which
he had destined for the assistance of Piccinino. He was no sooner aware
of his danger, than he boldly drew his sword, and endeavoured to cut his
way through the soldiers who were sent to secure him. In the conflict he
was wounded in the neck, and growing faint with loss of blood, he was
overpowered and carried as a prisoner into the castle. On the twentieth
day of his confinement he died, as some say of his wounds, according to
the report of others, of poison. By whatever means he came to his end, so
atrocious were the cruelties which he had committed during the days of
his power, that his death occasioned universal joy, and was regarded by
thousands as a signal instance of divine retribution.[337]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account