Bracciolini, Poggio, 1380-1459; Italy -- History -- 1268-1492
In reply to this second attack, Valla renewed and maintained his
protestation, that he had not been the aggressor in the present contest.
In contradiction to Poggio’s assertion, that he was an object of dislike
to the scholars of Italy, he quoted several complimentary epistles
which he had on various occasions received from men distinguished by
their learning. He also exposed the disingenuousness of his adversary,
who had branded him with the imputation of heresy, on the ground of
certain sentiments, which did indeed occur in his works, but which he
had advanced, not in his own character, but in that of an Epicurean
philosopher, whom he had introduced as an interlocutor in a dialogue. As
to the scandalous stories which Poggio had related to the disparagement
of his good name, he solemnly asserted, that the greater part of them
had not the least foundation in truth, and that the remainder were gross
and wilful misrepresentations of facts;[436] and in the true spirit
of retaliation, he narrated concerning Poggio a number of anecdotes
equally scandalous, and in all probability equally false, as those of
the circulation of which he himself complained. On the publication of
this second part of the _Antidotus_, Poggio, returning to the charge,
annoyed his foe in a third invective, in which, pursuing the idea of
Valla’s having been condemned to the infernal regions, he accounted for
his appearance on earth, by informing his readers, that on the culprit’s
arrival in hell, a council of demons was summoned to decide upon his
case; and that in consideration of the essential wickedness of his
character, they had permitted him, after solemnly swearing allegiance to
Satan, to return to earth for the purpose of gratifying his malevolent
dispositions, by effecting the perdition of others.[437]
Before Valla had seen this narration of his transactions in the kingdom
of darkness, he was provoked, by the account which he had received of
its tenor, to prosecute his criticisms on Poggio’s phraseology. These
criticisms stimulated Poggio to renew hostilities in a fourth and a
fifth invective. The former of these compositions has not yet been
committed to the press. The latter abounds in those flowers of eloquence,
of which specimens perhaps more than sufficiently ample have been already
presented to the reader.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account