was thus conveyed directed the attention of mathematicians to subjects
to which they might not have otherwise applied their powers. In this
way the discoveries which he had previously made were made subsequently
by others; and Leibnitz, in place of appearing in the theatre of
science as the disciple and the follower of Newton, stood forth with
all the dignity of a rival; and, by the early publication of his
discoveries had nearly placed himself on the throne which Newton was
destined to ascend.
It would be inconsistent with the popular nature of a work like this,
to enter into a detailed history of the dispute between Newton and
Leibnitz respecting the invention of fluxions. A brief and general
account of it, however, is indispensable.
In the beginning of 1673, Leibnitz came to London in the suite of
the Duke of Hanover, and he became acquainted with the great men who
then adorned the capital of England. Among these was Oldenburg, a
countryman of his own, who was then secretary to the Royal Society.
About the beginning of March, in the same year, Leibnitz went to
Paris, where, with the assistance of Huygens, he devoted himself to
the study of the higher geometry. In the month of July he renewed his
correspondence with Oldenburg, and he communicated to him some of
the discoveries which he had made relative to series, particularly
the series for a circular arc in terms of the tangent. Oldenburg
informed him in return of the discoveries on series which had been
made by Newton and Gregory; and in 1676 Newton communicated to him,
through Oldenburg, a letter of fifteen closely printed quarto pages,
containing many of his analytical discoveries, and stating that he
possessed a general method of drawing tangents, which he thought it
necessary to conceal in two sentences of transposed characters. In this
letter neither the method of fluxions nor any of its principles are
communicated; but the superiority of the method over all others is so
fully described, that Leibnitz could scarcely fail to discover that
Newton possessed that secret of which geometers had so long been in
quest.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account