Hitherto we have viewed Newton chiefly as a philosopher leading a life
of seclusion within the walls of a college, and either engaged in the
duties of his professorship, or ardently occupied in mathematical
and scientific inquiries. He had now reached the fifty-third year of
his age, and while those of his own standing at the university had
been receiving high appointments in the church, or lucrative offices
in the state, he still remained without any mark of the respect or
gratitude of his country. All Europe indeed had been offering incense
to his name, and Englishmen themselves boasted of him as the pride
of their country and the ornament of their species, but he was left
in comparative poverty,[87] with no other income than the salary of
his professorship, eked out with the small rental of his paternal
inheritance. Such disregard of the highest genius, dignified by the
highest virtue, could have taken place only in England, and we should
have ascribed it to the turbulence of the age in which he lived, had
we not seen, in the history of another century, that the successive
governments which preside over the destinies of our country have never
been able either to feel or to recognise the true nobility of genius.
Among his friends at Cambridge Newton had the honour of numbering
Charles Montague, grandson of Henry Earl of Manchester, a young man of
high promise, and every way worthy of his friendship. Though devoted to
literary pursuits, and twenty years younger than Newton, he cherished
for the philosopher all the veneration of a disciple, and his affection
for him gathered new strength as he rose to the highest honours and
offices of the state. In the year 1684 we find him co-operating with
Newton in the establishment of a philosophical society at Cambridge;
but though both of them had made personal application to different
individuals to become members, yet the plan failed, from the want, as
Newton expresses it, of persons willing to try experiments.
Mr. Montague sat along with Newton in the convention parliament, and
such were the powers which he displayed in that assembly as a public
speaker, that he was appointed a commissioner of the treasury, and
soon afterward a privy counsellor. In these situations his talents
and knowledge of business were highly conspicuous, and in 1694 he was
appointed chancellor of the exchequer. The current coin of the nation
having been adulterated and debased, one of his earliest designs was to
recoin it and restore it to its intrinsic value. This scheme, however,
met with great opposition. It was characterized as a wild project,
unsuitable to a period of war, as highly injurious to the interests
of commerce, and as likely to sap the foundation of the government.
But he had weighed the subject too deeply, and had intrenched himself
behind opinions too impartial and too well-founded, to be driven from a
measure which the best interests of his country seemed to require.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account