“I received what you wrote to me in Sir Isaac’s letter. I will set
about the index in a day or two. As for the preface, I should be
glad to know from Sir Isaac with what view he thinks proper to have
it written. You know the book has been received abroad with some
disadvantage, and the cause of it may be easily guessed at. The
_Commercium Epistolicum_, lately published by order of the Royal
Society, gives such indubitable proofs of Mr. Leibnitz’s want of
candour, that I shall not scruple in the least to speak out the
full truth of the matter, if it be thought convenient. There are
some pieces of his looking this way which deserve a censure, as
his _Tentamen de motuum cælestium causis_. If Sir Isaac is willing
that something of this nature may be done, I should be glad if,
while I am making the index, he would consider of it, and put down
a few notes of what he thinks most material to be insisted on.
This I say upon supposition that I write the preface myself. But I
think it will be much more advisable that you, or he, or both of
you should write it while you are in town. You may depend upon it I
will own it, and defend it as well as I can, if hereafter there be
occasion.—I am sir, &c.”
We are not acquainted with the instructions which were given to Mr.
Cotes in consequence of this application; but it appears from the
preface itself, which contains a long and able summary of the Newtonian
philosophy, that Sir Isaac had prohibited any personal reference to the
conduct of Leibnitz.
The general preface is dated 12th May, 1713, and in a subsidiary
preface of only a few lines, dated March 28th, 1713, Sir Isaac mentions
the leading alterations which had been made in this edition. The
determination of the forces by which bodies may revolve in given orbits
was simplified and enlarged. The theory of the resistance of fluids
was more accurately investigated, and confirmed by new experiments.
The theory of the moon and the precession of the equinoxes were more
fully deduced from their principles; and the theory of comets was
confirmed by several examples of their orbits more accurately computed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account