On the accession of George I. to the British throne in 1714, Sir Isaac
Newton became an object of interest at court. His high situation under
government, his splendid reputation, his spotless character, and, above
all, his unaffected piety attracted the attention of the Princess of
Wales, afterward queen-consort to George II. This lady, who possessed a
highly cultivated mind, derived the greatest pleasure from conversing
with Newton and corresponding with Leibnitz. In all her difficulties,
she received from Sir Isaac that information and assistance which
she had elsewhere sought in vain, and she was often heard to declare
in public that she thought herself fortunate in living at a time
which enabled her to enjoy the conversation of so great a genius. But
while Newton was thus esteemed by the house of Hanover, Leibnitz, his
great rival, endeavoured to weaken and undermine his influence. In
his correspondence with the princess, he represented the Newtonian
philosophy, not only as physically false, but as injurious to the
interests of religion. He asserted that natural religion was rapidly
declining in England, and he supported this position by referring
to the works of Locke, and to the beautiful and pious sentiments
contained in the 28th query at the end of the Optics. He represented
the principles of these great men as precisely the same with those of
the materialists, and thus endeavoured to degrade the character of
English philosophers.
These attacks of Leibnitz became subjects of conversation at court,
and when they reached the ear of the king, his majesty expressed his
expectation that Sir Isaac Newton would draw up a reply. He accordingly
entered the lists on the mathematical part of the controversy, and left
the philosophical part of it to Dr. Clarke, who was a full match for
the German philosopher. The correspondence which thus took place was
carefully perused by the princess, and from the estimation in which Sir
Isaac continued to be held, we may infer that the views of the English
philosopher were not very remote from her own.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account