Thus liberated from his persecutors, Galileo returned to Florence,
where he pursued his studies with his wonted diligence and ardour. The
recantation of his astronomical opinions was so formal and unreserved,
that ordinary prudence, if not a sense of personal honour, should
have restrained him from unnecessarily bringing them before the
world. No anathema was pronounced against his scientific discoveries;
no interdict was laid upon the free exercise of his genius. He was
prohibited merely from teaching a doctrine which the church of Rome
considered to be injurious to its faith. We might have expected,
therefore, that a philosopher so conspicuous in the eyes of the world
would have respected the prejudices, however base, of an institution
whose decrees formed part of the law of the land, and which possessed
the power of life and death within the limits of its jurisdiction.
Galileo, however, thought otherwise. A sense of degradation[37] seems
to have urged him to retaliate, and before six years had elapsed, he
began to compose his “Cosmical System, or Dialogues on the two greatest
Systems of the World, the Ptolemean and the Copernican,” the concealed
object of which is to establish the opinions which he had promised
to abandon. In this work the subject is discussed by three speakers,
Sagredo, Salviatus, and Simplicius, a peripatetic philosopher, who
defends the system of Ptolemy with much skill against the overwhelming
arguments of the rival disputants. Galileo hoped to escape notice by
this indirect mode of propagating the new system, and he obtained
permission to publish his work, which appeared at Florence in 1632.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account