The Life of Sir Rowland Hill and the History of Penny Postage, Vol. 1 (of 2)Hill, Rowland, Sir
History
The Life of Sir Rowland Hill and the History of Penny Postage, Vol. 1 (of 2)
Hill, Rowland, Sir
Hill, Rowland, Sir, 1795-1879; Postal service -- Great Britain -- Rates
“_February 9th._—Herries has been moving for certain returns of
Post Office revenue, &c., and the Chancellor of the Exchequer
tells me that he thinks the Tories, especially if they get
into power, will try to advance the rate to twopence. I told
him that I did not think they could succeed, at the same time
reminding him that I always was of opinion that twopence would
produce the larger revenue.”
Mr. Baring held the opposite opinion, and I now believe that he was
right. A few months afterwards, financial difficulties increasing, I
was called on to estimate the probable effect of raising the rate to
twopence, and my report, made, of course, after careful inquiry and
consideration, was not such as to induce Ministers to try the change. To
avoid recurring to the subject, I may here add that once only was the
question revived. This was during the financial pressure consequent on
the Crimean war; when, being called on to make a confidential report, I
showed that, though some immediate increase of revenue might be expected
from raising the rate to twopence, the benefit would probably be more
than counterbalanced, in the long run, by the check to correspondence;
and upon this, the project was finally abandoned.[313]
As has been seen, however, the course of the Tories was still uncertain:—
“_April 30th._—The Chancellor of the Exchequer brought on his
Budget to-night. I was under the gallery. The Tories were
aghast at the Free Trade proposals, which occupied so much of
their attention, that they had little to say on the subject
of postage. Perhaps the returns, showing the steady increase
of letters, may have something to do with the matter. Sir
Robert Peel was quite silent on the subject; Goulburn talked
some nonsense and made some false [erroneous would have been a
juster term] statements with as much confidence as though he
had understood what he was talking about. He was answered by
Hume.
“_May 12th._—The Chancellor of the Exchequer expressed an
apprehension that Sir Robert Peel would attempt to advance the
postage rate to twopence.
“_May 13th._—Mr. Wallace called to say that he has no doubt
Ministers must resign, and that the Tories will attempt to
advance the postage—he says to threepence. Last night Mr.
Patrick Chalmers told me fourpence.
“_July 6th._—He [the Chancellor of the Exchequer] still thinks
it probable that Peel will advance the rate.
“_August 27th._—The Chancellor of the Exchequer tells me that
from what he observed in the course of his speech last night
in the House of Commons, when he spoke of the reduction in
postage, he is satisfied that Peel does not intend to raise the
rate.... Cole reports that Mr. Moffatt has seen Lord Lowther,
who tells him that there is no danger of the Tories raising the
postage-rate.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account