In France, and in many other parts of the Continent, this division of
labour in Midwifery is fully carried out, and with great advantage to
both parties—to the regular practitioner, who is relieved of part of
his most arduous, most wearing and most unremunerative duties, and to
the women who have a vocation for medicine, who are able, thus, in
large numbers, to gain a respectable living in the profession they
wish to practise.
I think I may safely say that there are very few medical men who have
been ten years in practice, who would not gladly, thankfully, hand
over to a body of well-educated and friendly midwifes their half-
guinea or guinea midwifery cases. To a young practitioner there is the
charm of novelty, and the desire to improve, which make remuneration
altogether a secondary consideration. But after ten years‘ practice,
often long before, a very decided change comes over the spirit of the
dream.”
Footnote 66:
June 18th, 1870.
The part of the letter that follows is perhaps too technical for
quotation; but the writer continues on the general question:
“I would add in conclusion that, given women of exceptional energy,
capacity, and intelligence, nothing would be easier than for them, if
deserving, to rise out of the midwifery ranks into a wider sphere of
activity and worldly success. Let them show by their energy, by their
writing, by their contributions to the progress of medical science,
that they had exceptional powers of observation and intellect, and
fame would soon reach them. It has reached the very few women, who,
like Mrs. Somerville, have given evidence not only of mere ability and
talent, but higher powers, the power to grasp the more recondite and
abstruse teachings of science. But even this power—the power to master
and understand the existing state of science—does not constitute the
characteristic feature of the male mind in the Caucasian race. The
principal feature which appears to me to characterise the Caucasian
race, to raise it immeasurably above all other races, is the power
that many of its _male_ members have of advancing the horizon of
science, of penetrating beyond the existing limits of knowledge—in a
word, the power of scientific discovery. I am not aware that the
female members of our race participate in this power, in this supreme
development of the human mind; at least I know of no great discovery
changing the surface of science that owes its existence to a woman of
our or of any race. What right then have women to claim mental
_equality_ with men?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account