The life of the emperor Francis JosephGribble, Francis Henry
History
The life of the emperor Francis Joseph
Gribble, Francis Henry
Austria -- Court and courtiers; Austria -- History -- Franz Joseph I, 1848-1916; Franz Joseph I, Emperor of Austria, 1830-1916
So that it was a matter of course that Francis Ferdinand should be
required to proclaim _urbi et orbi_ that he was marrying beneath him;
that the marriage should be condemned to be a hole-and-corner affair
which even the bridegroom’s brothers did not attend; that the bride’s
status should be left so undignified that it was not permissible to her
to attend the opera with her husband, or to sit in the Imperial stand
with him at the races. But though that was Francis Joseph’s official
attitude as an Emperor and a Habsburg, he was also a man and a brother,
capable of tolerance and condescension—increasingly capable of it as
the years went by. Flexibility, good nature, weariness of the long
struggle with the Zeit Geist—one does not know to which of these
things to attribute the modification of his tone; but he has modified
it. Francis Ferdinand has been taken back into favour and allowed to
hold the highest offices suitable for him; and Countess Sophie Chotek
has been promoted to be Duchess of Hohenberg. She does not yet rank
with the Archduchesses, but she does take her place in the hierarchy
immediately after them.
How will she rank eventually, after the inevitable day on which Francis
Joseph is gathered to his fathers? That is a question which must soon,
in the course of nature, present itself; and it would be a great
mistake to suppose that it was settled, once and for all, when Francis
Ferdinand stood before the crucifix and swore that his wife was, and
that his children would be, inferior persons, unworthy to be related to
him. It is not merely that “Jove laughs at lovers’ perjuries,” or that
Francis Ferdinand’s heart rejects the Habsburg superstition to which we
have seen him rendering lip service. One must also remember that knots
of this kind can never be tied so tightly that no way of untying them
can be found by adroit and willing hands.
No doubt the Archduke is a religious man who understands the nature
of an oath; but he was “brought up by the Jesuits,” and one suspects
that he has not been brought up by them for nothing. All Catholics are
addicted to casuistry, and the Jesuits specialise in it; nor does one
need any extra-ordinary shrewdness to divine the insidious questions
which may be invoked as solvents of a situation which Francis Joseph
believed himself to have made hard and fast. Let us set them forth in
order:—
1. Granted that Francis Ferdinand had the right to swear away his own
rights, had he any right to swear away the potential rights of persons
still unborn?
2. Granted that Francis Ferdinand is personally bound by his oath,
on what grounds can that oath fetter the freedom of action of the
Hungarian and Austrian Parliaments?
3. Cannot the Pope, to whom God has given the power to loose and bind,
free any man from any obligation, even though he has sworn by bell,
book, and candle to bow to it?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account