Natural history -- Outdoor books; Nature; Nature study; Paris (France) -- Description and travel
short, others long, some wide, some narrow; they are all geometry and
white paint. The vast avenues, a rifle-shot across, such as the Avenue
de l'Opera, differ only in width and in the height of the houses. The
monotony of these gigantic houses is too great to be expressed. Then
across the end of the avenue they throw some immense facade--some
public building, an opera-house, a palace, a ministry, anything will
do--in order that you shall see nothing but Paris. Weary of the
gigantic monotony of the gigantic houses, exactly alike, your eye shall
not catch a glimpse of some distant cloud rising like a snowy mountain
(as Japanese artists show the top of Fusiyama); you shall not see the
breadth of the sky, nor even any steeple, tower, dome, or gable; you
shall see nothing but Paris; the avenue is wide enough for the Grand
Army to march down, but the exit to the eye is blocked by this immense
meaningless facade drawn across it. No doubt it is executed in the
"highest style"; in effect it appears a repetition of windows, columns,
and doorways exactly alike, all quite meaningless, for the columns
support nothing, like the fronts sold in boxes of children's toy
bricks. Perhaps on the roof there is some gilding, and you ask yourself
the question why it is there. These facades, of which there are so
many, vary in detail; in effect they are all the same, an utter
weariness to the eye. Every fresh day's research into the city brings
increasing disappointment, a sense of the childish, of feebleness, and
weakness exhibited in public, as if they had built in sugar for the top
of a cake. The level ground will not permit of any advantage of view;
there are none of those sudden views so common and so striking in
English towns. Everything is planed, smoothed, and set to an oppressive
regularity.
Turning round a corner one comes suddenly on a pillar of a dingy, dull
hue, whose outline bulges unpleasantly. In London you would shrug your
shoulders, mutter "hideous!" and pass on. This is the famous Vendome
Column. As for the Column of July, it is so insignificant, so silly (no
other word expresses it so well), that a second glance is carefully
avoided. The Hotel de Ville, a vast white building, is past
description, it is so plain and so repellent in its naked glaring
assertion. From about old Notre Dame they have removed every medieval
outwork which had grown up around and rendered it lifelike; it now
rises perpendicular and abrupt from the white surface of the square.
Unless you had been told that it was the Notre Dame of Victor Hugo you
would not look at its exterior twice. The interior is another matter.
In external form Notre Dame cannot enter into competition with
Canterbury. The barrack-like Hotel des Invalides, the tomb of
Napoleon--was ever a tomb so miserably lacking in all that should
inspire a reverential feeling?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account