The Life of the Rev. George Whitefield, Volume 2 (of 2)Tyerman, L. (Luke)
History
The Life of the Rev. George Whitefield, Volume 2 (of 2)
Tyerman, L. (Luke)
Whitefield, George, 1714-1770
“We cannot at all consent to any one going into Wiltshire that
belongs to your Association. Your business would chiefly be to
confound poor souls, by preaching strange doctrine, and
spreading scandalous lies. Should any of you go thither, after
receiving this, you will act contrary to all honesty. It is for
the sake of Mr. Howell Harris that we answer you at all. For
him we have regard; but with the rest of you we cannot have any
kind of fellowship at all. You are vainly puffed up,――the enemies
of Christ, and of His blood and atonement, which some of you
blaspheme. To say that we believed _you_ to be _fellow-labourers_
in the vineyard of Christ, would be dissimulation in us. We look
upon you as the destroyers of that vineyard; and we are much
grieved to see Mr. Whitefield’s labours and blessings so spoiled
and ruined by such evil-labourers. We are, however, sincerely,
your well-wishers,
“THE BRETHREN IN FETTER LANE.”[139]
Was there _any_ reason for the use of this strong and offensive
language? It is to be feared there was. Howell Harris, in his
autobiography, written in 1749, remarks:――
“About the year 1746, I saw a spirit creeping into the work
different from that which had been before; namely, the spirit
of levity, pride, foolish jesting, unwatchfulness, and carnal
rejoicing. This took place immediately after extensive frames
and transports, which many seemed to enjoy at the hearing of the
word, and singing, etc.; but the real and serious spirit that
began the work was at length almost extinguished. The spirit of
awakening sinners in the ministry was also, in a great measure,
lost; together with its real and solid fruits in the hearts of
men. I beheld a tendency in the ministry to please men, and to
appear wise and popular in the world; and the spirits of many of
my nearest friends grew great and proud, and would not take the
word of reproof or exhortation.”[140]
The work, however, was still prosecuted. At an Association, held
in London, June 18, 1746, it was determined to retain the “room”
at Lambeth; and an offer of “the playhouse, in the Haymarket,
Westminster,” was prayerfully considered. It was also resolved that,
“henceforth, the tickets should be delivered to every band and class
by their visitors; who, after consulting the minister, should take care
of the money” collected. The preachers, likewise, were stationed; some
to Deptford and Lambeth; some to Essex, Wiltshire, and Gloucestershire;
one to Portsmouth, and another to Bristol; and others to Chinnor,
Tewkesbury, Hereford, Ludlow, Shrewsbury, and Wales.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account