The Life of the Rev. George Whitefield, Volume 2 (of 2)Tyerman, L. (Luke)
History
The Life of the Rev. George Whitefield, Volume 2 (of 2)
Tyerman, L. (Luke)
Whitefield, George, 1714-1770
This is mightily amusing. Dr. Doddridge, the theological tutor of
the Dissenters’ College, daring to preach or pray in Whitefield’s
Tabernacle! What a sin against all ecclesiastical and ministerial
propriety! The poor Doctor, however, went further than even this. He
allowed Whitefield to preach in his own pulpit at Northampton! This
seemed to perfect the enormity. Among others who took the Northampton
professor to task for his eccentric conduct, was the Rev. John Barker,
an influential minister,[74] in London, who wrote as follows:――
“_November 4, 1743._
“It is an honour to our interest that you stand so well with
the sober and moderate clergy. For this reason, I was troubled
to hear of the late intercourse between you and Mr. Whitefield,
the consequence of which, with respect to the Church, it is
easy to foresee. I was willing to think well of the Methodists;
but, after a candid attention to them, their proceedings appear
not to me to be wise and good. Their devotion is unseasonable,
irregular, and injudicious. Their sermons are low and loose.
Their spirit appears to me turbulent, unruly, and censorious.
They practise upon weak people and poor people. They call them
to pray and sing when they should be in their business or their
beds. They disturb the peace and order of families, and give
great uneasiness in them. What they pretend to above their
neighbours appears to be mere enthusiasm. Their people are
slothful, or mopish, or dejected, or pragmatical, rather than
sober, discreet, judicious, exemplary, regular Christians;
and I have no expectation but that Methodism, like any other
enthusiasm, will promote infidelity, and turn out to the hurt
and damage of religion, and the souls of men. Though I judge
not their hearts, views, and motives, but admit those are secret
things which belong to God, yet I thought it needful, very
lately, to warn my hearers of these people’s errors, and advise
them to avoid them.”[75]
Doddridge’s chief castigator, however, was Nathaniel Neal, Esq., son
of the Rev. Daniel Neal, the historian of the Puritans. Nathaniel was
an eminent attorney, secretary to the Million Bank, and author of “A
Free and Serious Remonstrance to Protestant Dissenting Ministers, on
occasion of the Decay of Religion.”[76] He wrote not fewer than three
long letters to Doddridge, filling nine printed octavo pages, and dated
respectively, Million Bank, October 11, October 15, and December 10,
1743. He addresses Doddridge with great deference and respect; but,
evidently, in great alarm, lest Doddridge should irretrievably injure
his position and character, as the chief of the Dissenters’ tutors, by
countenancing the proceedings of the eccentric Methodist.
In the first of his letters, he writes:――
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account