The nest, that notable expression of maternal skill and care, is
rivalled by other modes of rearing which often reveal the most
wonderful tenderness. The Lycosa drags behind her, hanging to her
spinnerets, the wallet of eggs that bangs against her legs; and for
half the year she carries about on her back her young, fore-gathered in
a serried group. In like fashion does the Scorpion nurse her offspring
on her back; for a fortnight she allows them to gather strength against
the moment of emancipation. Exuding a white wax, the Dorthesia
contrives at the tip of the abdomen an exquisite muff into which the
young are born, and in which they adorn themselves with cottony tufts
and peacefully grow ripe for the exodus. The downy refuge, with its
narrow opening, allows the secluded offspring to emerge, one by one, as
they become capable of settling down upon the fostering spurge.
Lowly among the lowliest, the Kermes of the oak has invented something
even better: the mother, transformed into an unassailable fortress,
bequeaths to her family, as its cradle, her skin, toughened into an
ebony bastion.
In May let us patiently examine, in sunny corners, the slender twigs of
the holm-oak or evergreen oak. Let us also inspect that cross-grained
shrub with small prickly leaves, known to the Provençal peasant as the
avaus, and to botanists as the kermes oak. This wretched brushwood,
which one can pass over in a single stride, is really an oak, a genuine
oak, as is proved by its handsome acorns, set in their rough, prickly
cups. We will gather our harvest here as well as on the holm-oak. But
we shall pass by the ordinary or English oak; we should find on it
nothing in the least like what we are seeking to-day. Only the two
species first mentioned will repay exploration.
On these we shall see, a few here and a few there, but never in
abundance, certain globules of a glossy black, about the bigness of a
moderate-sized pea. Here we have the Kermes, one of the strangest of
insects. But is this an insect? Is it of the animal kingdom? The
uninitiated would never suspect such a thing; he would take the object
for a berry, some species of black current. The mistake is all the more
natural in that the globule, if bitten into, cracks, and yields a
sweetish flavour, offset by a slight bitterness.
And this all but delicious fruit, we are told, is of the animal
kingdom; it is an insect. Let us look at the creature closely, through
the pocket microscope. We look for a head, an abdomen, and legs. There
is absolutely not a vestige of a head, nor of an abdomen, nor of legs;
all there is to be seen is a sort of large bead, fit for that cheap
jewellery which is made of jet. Is there not at least that division
into segments, which is the documentary proof of the insect? No! A
pebble is not more lifeless.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account