The Life Of Thomas Paine, Vol. 2. (of 2): With A History of His Literary, Political and Religious Career in America France, and EnglandConway, Moncure Daniel
History
The Life Of Thomas Paine, Vol. 2. (of 2): With A History of His Literary, Political and Religious Career in America France, and England
Conway, Moncure Daniel
Paine, Thomas, 1737-1809
It will be seen, by Madame Bonneville's and Jarvis' statements
elsewhere, that Paine lost his case against Elisha Ward, on what ground
it is difficult to imagine. The records of the Supreme Court, at Albany,
and the Clerk's office at White Plains, have been vainly searched for
any trace of this trial. Mr. John H. Riker, son of Paine's counsel, has
examined the remaining papers of Richard Riker (many were accidentally
destroyed) without finding anything related to the matter. It is so
terrible to think that with Jefferson, Clinton, and Madison at the head
of the government, and the facts so clear, the federalist Elisha Ward
could vindicate his insult to Thomas Paine, that it may be hoped the
publication of these facts will bring others to light that may put a
better face on the matter.*
* Gilbert Vale relates an anecdote which suggests that a
reaction may have occurred in Elisha Ward's family: "At the
time of Mr. Paine's residence at his farm, Mr. Ward, now a
coffee-roaster in Gold Street, New York, and an assistant
alderman, was then a little boy and residing at New
Rochelle. He remembers the impressions his mother and some
religious people made on him by speaking of Tom Paine, so
that he concluded that Tom Paine must be a very bad and
brutal man. Some of his elder companions proposed going into
Mr. Paine's orchard to obtain some fruit, and he, out of
fear, kept at a distance behind, till he beheld, with
surprise, Mr. Paine come out and assist the boys in getting
apples, patting one on the head and caressing another, and
directing them where to get the best. He then advanced and
received his share of encouragement, and the impression this
kindness made on him determined him at a very early period
to examine his writings. His mother at first took the books
from him, but at a later period restored them to him,
observing that he was then of an age to judge for himself;
perhaps she had herself been gradually undeceived, both as
to his character and writings."
Madame Bonneville may have misunderstood the procedure for which she
had to pay costs, as Paine's legatee. Whether an ultimate decision was
reached or not, the sufficiently shameful fact remains that Thomas Paine
was practically disfranchised in the country to which he had rendered
services pronounced pre-eminent by Congress, by Washington, and by every
soldier and statesman of the Revolution.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account