The Life of Tolstoy: First Fifty Years: Fifth EditionMaude, Aylmer
General
The Life of Tolstoy: First Fifty Years: Fifth Edition
Maude, Aylmer
Tolstoy, Leo, graf, 1828-1910
At twenty-six years of age[33] I returned to Petersburg after the
war, and met the writers. They received me as one of themselves and
flattered me. And before I had time to look round I had adopted
the class views on life of the authors I had come among, and these
views completely obliterated all my former strivings to improve.
Those views furnished a theory which justified the dissoluteness
of my life. The view of life of these people, my comrades in
authorship, consisted in this: that life in general goes on
developing, and in this development we--men of thought--have
the chief part; and among men of thought it is we--artists and
poets--who have the chief influence. Our vocation is to teach
mankind. And lest the simple question should suggest itself: What
do I know, and what can I teach? it is explained in this theory
that this need not be known, and that the artist and poet teach
unconsciously. I was considered an admirable artist and poet, and
therefore it was very natural for me to adopt this theory. I,
artist and poet, wrote and taught, without myself knowing what. For
this I was paid money; I had excellent food, lodging, women and
society; and I had fame, which showed that what I taught was very
good.
[33] Tolstoy makes a slip here: he was over twenty-seven.
This faith in the meaning of poetry and in the development of life,
was a religion, and I was one of its priests. To be its priest was
very pleasant and profitable. And I lived a considerable time in
this faith without doubting its validity. But in the second, and
especially in the third year of this life, I began to doubt the
infallibility of this religion and to examine it. My first cause of
doubt was that I began to notice that the priests of this religion
were not all in accord among themselves. Some said: We are the best
and most useful teachers; we teach what is wanted, but the others
teach wrongly. Others said: No! we are the real teachers, and you
teach wrongly. And they disputed, quarrelled, abused one another,
cheated, and tricked one another. There were also many among them
who did not care who was right and who was wrong, but were simply
bent on attaining their covetous aims by means of this activity of
ours. All this obliged me to doubt the validity of our creed.
Moreover, having begun to doubt the truth of the authors' creed
itself, I also began to observe its priests more attentively, and
I became convinced that almost all the priests of that religion,
the writers, were immoral, and for the most part men of bad,
worthless character, much inferior to those whom I had met in my
former dissipated and military life; but they were self-confident
and self-assured as only those can be who are quite holy or who do
not know what holiness is. These people revolted me, and I became
revolting to myself, and I realised that that faith is a fraud.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account