The Life of Tolstoy: First Fifty Years: Fifth EditionMaude, Aylmer
General
The Life of Tolstoy: First Fifty Years: Fifth Edition
Maude, Aylmer
Tolstoy, Leo, graf, 1828-1910
Terrible to say, I came to the conviction that all that we have
done in those two departments has been done along a false and
exceptional path, which lacks importance, has no future, and is
insignificant in comparison with the demands upon, and even with
the samples of, those same arts which we find put forward by the
people. I became convinced that such lyrical compositions as,
for example, Poúshkin's 'I remember the marvellous moment,' and
such musical productions as Beethoven's Last Symphony, are not so
absolutely and universally good as the song of 'Willy the Steward'
or the melody of 'Floating down the river, Mother Vólga'; and that
Poúshkin and Beethoven please us, not because they are absolutely
beautiful, but because we are as spoiled as they, and because they
flatter our abnormal irritability and weakness. How common it is to
hear the empty and stale paradox, that to understand the beautiful,
a preparation is necessary! Who said so? Why? What proves it? It
is only a shift, a loophole, to escape from the hopeless position
to which the false direction of our art, produced for one class
alone, has led us. Why are the beauty of the sun and of the human
face, and the beauty of the sounds of a folk-song, and of deeds of
love and self-sacrifice, accessible to every one, and why do _they_
demand no preparation?
For years I vainly strove to make my pupils feel the poetic
beauties of Poúshkin and of our whole literature, and a similar
attempt is being made by innumerable teachers not in Russia alone;
and if these teachers notice the results of their efforts, and will
be frank about the matter, they will admit that the chief result of
this attempt to develop poetic feeling, is to kill it; and that it
is just those pupils whose natures are most poetic who show most
aversion to such commentaries....
I will try to sum up all that I have said above. In reply to the
question: Do people need the _beaux arts_? pedagogues usually grow
timid and confused (only Plato decided the matter boldly in the
negative). They say: 'Art is needed, but with certain limitations;
and to make it possible for all to become artists would be bad for
the social structure. Certain arts and certain degrees of art can
only exist in a certain class of society. The arts must have their
special servants, entirely devoted to them,' They say: 'It should
be possible for those who are greatly gifted to escape from among
the people and devote themselves completely to the service of art.'
That is the greatest concession pedagogy makes to the right of each
individual to become what he likes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account