The Life or Legend of Gaudama, the Buddha of the Burmese (Volume II)Bigandet, Paul Ambroise
Religion
The Life or Legend of Gaudama, the Buddha of the Burmese (Volume II)
Bigandet, Paul Ambroise
Buddhism -- Burma; Burma -- Religion; Gautama Buddha
Every member of the order, on his entering the profession, must renounce
his own will and bend his neck under the yoke of the rule. So anxious
indeed has been the framer of its statutes to leave no room or field open
to the independent exertions of the mind, that every action of the day,
the manner of performing it, the time it ought to last, the circumstances
that must attend it, have all been minutely regulated. From the moment
a Rahan rises in the morning to the moment he is to go to enjoy his
natural rest in the evening, his only duty is to obey and follow the
ever-subsisting will and commands of the founder of the society. He
advances in perfection proportionately to his fervent compliance with the
injunctions of, and to his conscientiously avoiding all that has been
forbidden by, the sagacious legislator. The trespassing of one article
of the rule constitutes a sin. The various sins a Rahan is liable to
commit are comprised under seven principal heads. 1st, the Paradzekas;
2d, the Thinga-de-ceits; 3d, the Patzei; 4th, the Toolladzi; 5th, the
Duka; 6th, the Dupaci; and 7th, the Pati-de-kani. These seven kinds of
sins are subdivided and multiplied to the number of 227, which constitute
the total amount of sins either of commission or omission that a Phongyie
may commit during the time that he remains a member of the holy society.
The Paradzikas are four in number: fornication, theft, killing, and
vainglory in attributing to one’s self high attainments in perfection.
A recluse, on the day of his admission, is, as before related, warned
never to commit these four sins, under the penalty of being excluded
from the society. They are irremissible in their nature. The meaning of
this is, He who has had the misfortune of yielding to temptation, and
committing one of these four offences, is no longer to be considered as a
member of the Thanga, or of the assembly of the perfect. He is _de facto_
excluded from the society. He may exteriorly continue to be a member of
the Thanga, but inwardly he really no longer belongs to it. All other
offences are subjected to the law of confession, and can be expiated by
virtue of the penances imposed upon the delinquent after he has made a
public avowal of his sins.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account