Celtic literature -- History and criticism; Ireland -- In literature
To the spirit of these conversations, or to the form in which they are
cast, no exception can reasonably be taken. In one respect only might
students of history dissent, and that is, to the selection of St.
Patrick as spokesman for the bigotry that is here pilloried.
Those who are familiar with the authentic records of his life and the
spirit of his teaching will feel that an injustice is done the apostle
of Ireland, by associating his name with such counterfeit sentiment. Had
a typical medieval monk or cleric been selected as advocate of the
repulsive theology represented here, the rôle would have been more true
to life and historical fact. As it is, one feels that a noble character
is traduced and put in a false setting. These Dialogues are profoundly
interesting, not only because of the struggle between nature and dogma,
between the cosmic process and the ethical, here brought into
irreconcilable antagonism, but also because the two original and
independent streams of Gaelic literature seem here to meet, and, like
the rushing together of contrary tides or of two confluent currents, to
mingle their waters together in a wild tumult of angry waves, which only
subsides as each again gradually finds its own channel.
One of the most interesting of the Dialogues is that which is known as
“Ossian’s Prayer,” and is about 150 lines in length. The bard begins by
asking the saint if the Feinn of Erin are in heaven. When he is informed
that his father, Gaul, and Oscar cannot be there, he not unnaturally
retorts, “If Erin’s Feinn are not in heaven, why should I Christian be?”
Thereupon the saint taunts him with irreverent fierceness of language,
adding “What are all the Feinn of Erin to one hour with God alone?” But
Ossian declares he would prefer to see one battle waged by the valiant
Feinn than to see the Lord of Heaven and his cleric (Patrick) chanting
sin.
The saint tries to impress him with God’s omniscience by telling him in
effect that it would be impossible for the smallest midge to enter
heaven without God’s knowledge. “How different from Finn,” exclaims the
bard, “thousands might enter, partake of his cheer, and depart without
notice.”
The argument throughout shows complete divergence in their thought.
“Finn is in hell in bonds,” says Patrick. “He is now in the house of
pain and sorrow, because of the amusement he had with the hounds and for
attending the (bardic) schools each day, and because he took no heed of
God.” And to an interpolation of Ossian, “Misery attend thee, old man,”
he continues, “who speakest words of madness; God is better for one hour
than all the Fenians of Erin.”
To which the bard retorts, “O Patrick, who makest me that impertinent
answer, thy crozier would be in atoms were Oscar present. Were my son
Oscar and God hand in hand on Knock-na-veen, if I saw my son down, it is
then I would say that God was a strong man.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account