The literature of the Highlanders : $b a history of Gaelic literature from the earliest times to the present dayMacNeill, Nigel
History
The literature of the Highlanders : $b a history of Gaelic literature from the earliest times to the present day
MacNeill, Nigel
Scottish Gaelic literature -- History and criticism
The view of Dr Skene was scarcely maintained hitherto by any Scottish
Gaelic scholar. Shaw in 1788 echoed Johnson’s sentiments. He began
to read through Macpherson; and was held immediately to scorn by the
Gaelic literati.
9. _The Late Rev. Thomas Pattison_, author of “The Gaelic Bards”
(1866), and a man highly capable of forming judgment on the question,
says, “When we consider that the finest parts of Macpherson’s Ossian
are incontestably proved to have been popular poetry long anterior
to his appearing, I think we should throw all prejudice aside, and
affirm that whoever composed the poems attributed to Ossian, James
Macpherson was not the man; and that whatever merit may belong to
him as a translator, or whatever claim he may have to be considered
their compiler in their present form, he has no legitimate title
to be called their author. They are substantially older than he,
probably by many centuries.” Pattison, like many others before him,
dwells on Macpherson’s inferior Gaelic scholarship; but the facts
do not warrant the conclusion drawn, that Macpherson was incapable
of writing the Gaelic Ossian. Macpherson was a man of genius, and
quite able to deliver himself in Gaelic as good and classical as many
scholars that lived then or since.
10. _John F. Campbell, Esq._—The most formidable opponent of the
authenticity of Macpherson’s Ossian recently is Mr Campbell of Islay.
His earlier views, as expressed in the Highland Tales, were those
of Gaelic-speaking Highlanders in general. But the longer he dwelt
among the genuine old ballads found in manuscripts and in collections
taken down from the oral recitation of Highlanders who lived before
Macpherson’s time, the more confirmed he became in his growing
conviction that Macpherson was both translator and author, and that
the English was first composed. “My opinion now,” he says, “is that
Macpherson’s translation was first composed by a great genius, partly
from a knowledge of Scotch nature and folk-lore, partly from ideas
gathered from books, and that he and other translators afterwards
worked at it, and made a Gaelic equivalent whose merit varies
according to the translator’s skill and knowledge of Gaelic. It is
said that an early copy of the 7th book of Temora, with corrections
in Strathmashie’s hand, was found after his death. I suppose that he
revised a Gaelic translation by Macpherson, or by some other. His
own Gaelic songs are idiomatic, whereas the 7th book of Temora is
Saxon Gaelic in general, and nonsense in many passages. The English
equivalent is like the rest of Macpherson’s work. In either case,
because of matter, manner, orthography, and language, Macpherson’s
English and Gaelic Ossian, must have been composed long after Dean
MacGregor collected his book in Macpherson’s country, near his
district, and in Morven.” This is the opinion of a Gaelic-speaking
gentleman thoroughly conversant with the facts of the case, and
eminently qualified to maintain his side of the question.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account