The Little Review, May 1914 (Vol. 1., No. 3)Various
General
The Little Review, May 1914 (Vol. 1., No. 3)
Various
Literature, Modern -- 20th century -- Periodicals
Well, then! If they no longer pride themselves on being German, and are
easily assimilated by the second generation, we should expect to see the
slight stigma of being of German descent removed by this time. But is
it? Not long ago I had occasion to attend a Bach revival and the
beautiful passion music was played and sung. One of my friends remarked,
"You have to get used to this music before you can appreciate it," and I
retorted condescendingly, "I don't; I have heard it from childhood. This
is the kind of music we sing in the Lutheran church." This same friend
later, guiding my tottering steps through the mazes and pitfalls of
society in the "most aristocratic suburb of New York," said
hesitatingly, "I don't think I'd mention it, especially to people in
general, that I was a Lutheran, if I were you." Of course I was seized
immediately with a perfectly natural desire to talk of it in season and
out to everyone I met. Why not? Why not be a Lutheran as naturally as an
Episcopalian or a Methodist? "Well, they are mostly Germans, you see."
But I don't see, and I never have seen, although this article,
enlightening and interesting, goes nearer to the reasons for such an
attitude than anything else I have ever read.
REJECTIONS BY EDITORS
Never again shall I feel a sense of shame and humiliation on receiving
my rejected MS. and the printed slip. I have always suspected that it
was on account of the editors' lack of taste and discrimination; now I
am sure of it. Indeed, I'm not quite sure but that it argues more to be
rejected than to be accepted. I'm beginning to be proud of it. Read
Henry Sydnor Harrison's article in the April Atlantic--Adventures with
the Editors--and see if you don't feel the same way! Or, perhaps, you've
never been rejected with the added ignominy of the printed slip. If so,
don't read this; it is not for you. But all ye rejected ones take
renewed hope from this statement that an editor, actually an editor
himself, has made:
"I think I can tell you why editors so frequently reject the earlier and
often the best work of writers: it is because any new writer who sends
in first-class work sends in work that is very different from what
editors are used to."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account