The Lives of the Saints, Volume 02 (of 16): FebruaryBaring-Gould, S. (Sabine)
Religion
The Lives of the Saints, Volume 02 (of 16): February
Baring-Gould, S. (Sabine)
Christian saints
The history of this noble Confessor is a sad one, for it opens up to
us a picture of the dissensions which tore the Church in the 4th
century. It will be remembered that the Church was at that period
suffering from the prevalence of Arianism, which denied the Eternal
Godhead of the Son. Favoured by the Court, Arianism had penetrated
into the Church on all sides; many of the bishops were Arian, others
were semi-Arian, unwilling to pronounce decidedly against the Godhead
of Christ, and unwilling also to declare that great doctrine to be the
Truth. The election of the bishops being in the hands of the people,
if among the laity and clergy low views of Christ's nature prevailed,
an Arian was chosen to be their bishop. It was none the better when
the emperors interfered to nominate, for they would expel an orthodox
prelate and substitute for him one who was an Arian. And it must be
remembered that Arians were at that time mixed up with Catholics, as
parties in the Church, and did not at first stand to one another in
the position of separate and antagonistic communions. By the
predominance of the votes of Arians, Meletius was elected and
consecrated bishop of Beroea, and was afterwards by the same
influence translated to the See of Sebaste.[37] He was present at the
council of Seleucia (359), where he sided with the shifty semi-Arian
Acacius of Cæsarea. But his eyes seem to have opened to the truth, and
that gentle and peace-loving disposition which made him at first
willing to soften differences was braced up by the imminence of the
danger to true religion, to take a bold step. A council, assembled at
Antioch in 361, placed Meletius in the see. This excellent man had a
persuasive eloquence and a disposition which endeared him both to
Catholics and Arians. A rumour began to spread that he was positively
Catholic. After some sermons of a general character, he was desired to
take part in a series of expositions of the great controverted text,
Prov. viii. 22. After George, bishop of Laodicea, had given a strongly
Arian address, and Acacius, bishop of Cæsarea, had read a paper which
seemed to aim at a safe ambiguity, Meletius rose, and asserted, in
unequivocal language, the essential doctrine of Nicæa. The church rang
with cries of applause and wrath, proceeding from Catholics and
Arians. The Arian archdeacon stopped the new patriarch's mouth with
his hand. Meletius held out three fingers, then one; and when his lips
were freed by the archdeacon's seizing his hands, he repeated aloud
his former words, and exhorted the people to cling to the Nicene
faith. This could not be borne; the council, at another session,
deposed Meletius; the Emperor Constantius drove him into exile;
Euzoius, an old comrade of Arius, was made bishop of Antioch; and a
new creed was published which affirmed that the Son was in nowise like
to the Father, and was made out of what once was not. This led to a
separation between the Catholics and the Arians. The latter were put
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account