The Logic of Vegetarianism: Essays and DialoguesSalt, Henry S.
Philosophy
The Logic of Vegetarianism: Essays and Dialogues
Salt, Henry S.
Vegetarianism
BRITISH ISLANDER: Then how do you account for the fact
that northern races have been, to so great an extent,
carnivorous?
VEGETARIAN: Perhaps because in primitive times hunting
and pasturage were less toilsome than agriculture. But I
am not called on to "account" for such a fact. Their
past addiction to flesh food no more proves the present
utility of flesh-eating than their gross drinking habits
prove the utility of alcohol.
BRITISH ISLANDER: Can you quote any scientific authority
for your contention?
VEGETARIAN: There is one which is all the more valuable
because it is an admission made by an opponent. Sir
William Lawrence wrote: "That men can be perfectly
nourished, and that their physical and intellectual
capabilities can be fully developed in any climate by a
diet purely vegetable, has been proved by such abundant
experience that it will not be necessary to adduce any
formal arguments on the subject."[28] "In any climate,"
mark! And a diet "purely vegetable"; whereas all _you_
are asked to do is to forego the actual flesh foods, and
not the animal products. But come now! Ask me the great
question!
Footnote 28:
Rees's "Encyclopædia," Article, "Man."
BRITISH ISLANDER: What is that? There is only one other
I had in mind. What would become of the Esquimaux?
VEGETARIAN: Of course! I have always been profoundly
touched by the disinterested concern of the Englishman
(when vegetarianism looms ahead) for the future of that
Arctic people. Well, perhaps the question of what
ice-bound savages might do, or might not do, need
scarcely delay the decision of civilised mankind. For
that matter, what would become of the polar bears? If
you cannot dissociate your habits from those of the
Esquimaux, why don't you eat blubber? At least they have
a better reason for eating blubber than some people have
for eating beef—they can get nothing else.
The dishonesty of the excuse that vegetarianism "may be all very
well in the tropics" is shown by the fact that Englishmen, when
living in the tropics, make precisely the contrary statement.
"You would be surprised," writes Mr. B. K. Adams, from Ceylon,
"if you knew how much prejudice and opposition there is
here. The most amusing part is that nearly everyone says, it
is all very well being a vegetarian in England, in a cool
climate like that, but out here in this hot, depressing, and
enervating climate, you must have meat, and some add alcoholic
stimulant."[29]
Footnote 29:
_Vegetarian Messenger_, January, 1899.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account