The Logic of Vegetarianism: Essays and DialoguesSalt, Henry S.
Philosophy
The Logic of Vegetarianism: Essays and Dialogues
Salt, Henry S.
Vegetarianism
The true function of the chemist in his general relation to the
diet question is to help the coming dietary by transferring to
the vegetarian system some of the scientific attention that has
hitherto been solely devoted to flesh meats. "Men of practical
science," says Sir B. W. Richardson, "ought to be at work
assisting with their skill in bringing about that mighty
reformation. We now know to a nicety the relation of the various
parts of food needed for the construction of the living body,
and there should be no difficulty, except the labour of
research, in so modifying food from its prime source as to make
it applicable to every necessity without the assistance of any
intermediate animal at all." Why should not the chemist, instead
of maintaining, like Mrs. Partington, a pettifogging and quite
futile opposition to the flowing tide, put himself in the
current of progress, and try to turn his special knowledge to
the furtherance of a noble end?
CONDITIONS OF CLIMATE
To try to "change the venue" is sometimes the policy of
defendants in an action at law, and a similar device is adopted
by those who would stave off the hearing of the vegetarian case.
"The tropics" are the convenient limbo to which this uncongenial
subject is most frequently consigned; and it is with a proud
sense of humour and self-assurance that the British Islander,
who objects to alien immigration and all foreign frivolities,
warns the vegetarian heresy to keep clear of his inhospitable
clime. Such diet may be all very well, he thinks, for passive
Hindoos, but not for the hard-working inhabitants of this
temperate zone.
BRITISH ISLANDER: Vegetarianism? No thank you; not
_here_! All very nice in Africa and India, I dare say,
where you can sit all day under a palm-tree and eat
dates.
VEGETARIAN: But I have not observed that when you
visit Africa or India you practise vegetarianism.
On the contrary, you take your flesh-pots with you
everywhere—even to the very places where you admit
you don't need them, and where, as in India, they
give the greatest offence to the inhabitants.
BRITISH ISLANDER: Oh, well, it's no affair of theirs, is
it, if I take my roast beef?
VEGETARIAN: Yet you think it your affair to interfere
with the cannibals when they take their roast man. And
have you observed that it is in the tropical zone, not
the temperate zone, that cannibalism is most rife?
BRITISH ISLANDER: Why do you remind me of that?
VEGETARIAN: To show you that all this talk about
vegetarianism being "a matter of climate" is pure
humbug. The use of flesh is a vicious habit everywhere,
and nowhere a necessity, except where other food is not
procurable.
BRITISH ISLANDER: But do we not need more oil and fat in
northern climates?
VEGETARIAN: Undoubtedly; but these can be readily
obtained without recourse to flesh.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account