The London Mercury, Vol. I, Nos. 1-6, November 1919 to April 1920Various
General
The London Mercury, Vol. I, Nos. 1-6, November 1919 to April 1920
Various
English literature -- Periodicals; London (England) -- Periodicals
Mr. Allison writes with no pretensions to literary art, and he
sometimes chronicles very trifling occurrences; but he has an engaging
modesty and a genial "take it or leave it" attitude which redeem his
book from the charge of triviality. _My Kingdom for a Horse!_ should
be invaluable to the historian of social manners and to the novelist
who is anxious to get material for the reconstruction of a time which
already seems historical. There are plenty of illustrations--mostly
process reproductions of old photographs and examples of Phil May's
work. We wish, by the way, if Mr. Allison owns the copyright, that he
would persuade some publisher to issue a new and worthier edition of
May's _The Parson and the Painter_, which first appeared in the _St.
Stephen's Review_.
POLITICS AND ECONOMICS
HOW THE WAR CAME. By the EARL LOREBURN. Methuen. 7_s._ 6_d._ net.
There is very little disagreement to-day, we suppose, as to who were
the prime authors of the War. But on the minor question, whether any
blame attaches to the Entente Powers, opinion is, as it was from the
beginning, far more divided. The controversy as to our own position in
the crisis, which had almost faded out of the public mind, is sharply
revived by Lord Loreburn's book. Lord Loreburn, let us hasten to say,
does not deny the guilt of Germany. Indeed, he is at pains to show how
the Bismarckian tradition, improved upon by chauvinistic professors,
a more or less demented monarch and a ruthless military caste, had
sapped the morality of the German nation and made it all too ready to
follow its rulers into a deliberate attack on the peace of Europe. Nor
does he lend any support to the suggestion that the British Government
or the British people wanted war with Germany. He pays a tribute to
the efforts made by the Foreign Secretary to avert the disaster at
the eleventh hour. And yet Viscount Grey cannot, in his mind, escape
a large share of responsibility for the final conflagration. For what
made the war inevitable, he asserts, was our entente with France.
That entente was a departure from the traditional British policy of
holding aloof from all Continental entanglements. It was developed by
Sir Edward Grey, with the assistance of Mr. Asquith and Lord Haldane,
behind the backs of Parliament, and even of the Cabinet, from the end
of 1905 onwards. Not only was Sir Edward Grey working in secret; he was
committing this country to the support of France (and through France
of Russia) without taking the necessary steps to increase the army so
as to make that support effective. And, worst of all, he had nothing
in black and white to define exactly to what amount of support we were
committed. The result was seen on August 4th, 1914, when it became
manifest that we were under an obligation of honour to join our arms
with the French against Germany. Sir Edward Grey, of course, maintained
that we were not so bound, that we were free to decide whether to
declare war or not.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account