The London Mercury, Vol. I, Nos. 1-6, November 1919 to April 1920Various
General
The London Mercury, Vol. I, Nos. 1-6, November 1919 to April 1920
Various
English literature -- Periodicals; London (England) -- Periodicals
one of the greatest of modern composers, says he does not understand it
and, asking himself whether Scriabin was "sane or deranged," declares
that he does not know? Here is a lesson for Drama Leagues, for it is
almost certain that when we do get good drama scarcely anyone will know
it.
* * * * *
A society called "The Phœnix," with headquarters at Dudley House,
Southampton Street, Strand, has been formed to revive plays of
Elizabethan, Restoration, and later times. The following plays have
been selected for early production:
_The Duchess of Malfi_ (John Webster), _Marriage à la Mode_ (John
Dryden), _The Fair Maid of the West_, Part I. (Thomas Heywood), _Don
Carlos_ (Thomas Otway), _Volpone_ (Ben Jonson). _The Duchess of Malfi_
will be given on Sunday, November 16th.
DRAMATIC LITERATURE
HEARTBREAK HOUSE, ETC. By BERNARD SHAW. Constable. 7_s._ 6_d._
Mr. Shaw is one of the most consistent authors living. His readers know
almost to a comma what he is going to give them every time they open
his latest book. That is perhaps the chief reason why there has been
such a falling off in Mr. Shaw's popularity of recent years. Another
reason is, of course, the war; but it is strange that Mr. Shaw's
opinions, or his particular way of expressing his opinion, during the
war should have alienated and even made bitterly hostile men of wide
knowledge and experience of his writings and his character who, if they
could be persuaded momentarily to reflect without prejudice, would have
to admit that what offends them now was precisely what offended so many
others in the years before the war, when they on the contrary were Mr.
Shaw's ardent champions or, at the very least, his apologists. It only
goes to show how very far anyone of us is from being able to judge a
man's work rationally once our own particular prejudice is touched. We
are all raw somewhere, and woe to the man who touches us on the raw,
for then all hope of dispassionate criticism, of Christian toleration
even, is gone. It has been Mr. Shaw's most vivid characteristic that
he has never lost his intellectual integrity. It is easy to be honest
among one's enemies, but to be honest among one's friends is a virtue
so rare, so uncomfortable, and outwardly so contrary to the spirit of
fair play that it is not surprising it should be generally detested.
Mr. Shaw has always retained what he believes, perhaps conceitedly, to
be his right to say the worst that can be said of his dearest friends,
and of the advocates of whatever cause happens at the moment to be
nearest to his heart. However ruinous such conduct may appear to be to
the immediate interests of the movement he is supposed to support, he
will not abandon his right to forge weapons for the enemy more damaging
than any discoverable by their own brains. When life or one's country
or one's family is at stake, such conduct appears little less than
devilish, yet Mr. Shaw has his right to express his opinions as lucidly
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account