The London Mercury, Vol. I, Nos. 1-6, November 1919 to April 1920Various
General
The London Mercury, Vol. I, Nos. 1-6, November 1919 to April 1920
Various
English literature -- Periodicals; London (England) -- Periodicals
It was no doubt well that Mr. Jones's sincerity should be probed; and
this is in fact what Butler does at his best. He challenges established
opinions and forces those who hold them to consider whether they have
any good ground for doing so. But the reader who is not dazzled by
Butler's originality of judgment in this instance will ask himself
whether the sentence which Mr. Jones quotes is anything more than a
very facile assertion. He will then perhaps ask himself how often
Butler's original pronouncements on established reputations are of the
same order. He will certainly find some. In the _Note-books_ there is
an elaborate arraignment of Raphael. It may not be convincing; but the
critic has produced his arguments. Here, also, may be found Butler's
explanation of his hostility towards post-Handelian music. But one
may search the two volumes of the biography for a considerable time
without finding his appreciation of any book published in his own time.
Here, again, we must be just: Butler did like one book. It was called
_Pusley, or My Summer in a Garden_; its author was Charles Dudley
Warner; and Butler said, "I like _Pusley_ very much and have read it
all."
But the majority of his opinions are on the model of the much-quoted
passage in the _Note-books_:
Talking it over, we agreed that Blake was no good because he learnt
Italian at sixty in order to study Dante, and we knew Dante was no
good because he was so fond of Virgil, and Virgil was no good because
Tennyson ran him, and as for Tennyson--well, Tennyson goes without
saying.
That is an exceedingly witty way of expressing an indolent prejudice;
and those who share that particular chain of prejudices may well
rejoice in it, without supposing that it proves their case. But this
particular form of humour and Butler's independence of attitude would
be slightly more entertaining if he had occasionally replaced the
reputations he smashed with these hammer-strokes by some discovery of
his own. Unfortunately, it is not easy to remember any unknown author
whom he brought into the light--unless Nausicaa be taken as an example.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account