The London Mercury, Vol. I, Nos. 1-6, November 1919 to April 1920Various
General
The London Mercury, Vol. I, Nos. 1-6, November 1919 to April 1920
Various
English literature -- Periodicals; London (England) -- Periodicals
He had little influence on his successors; the comedy of humours died
without any but an abortive issue. Shadwell, the mountain-bellied "Og,
from a treason tavern rolling home," is not a disciple that any man
would have much pride in claiming. No raking up of literary history
will make Ben Jonson great as a founder of a school or an inspirer of
others. His greatness is a greatness of character. There is something
almost alarming in the spectacle of this formidable figure advancing
with tank-like irresistibility towards the goal he had set himself to
attain. No sirens of romance can seduce him, no shock of opposition
unseat him in his career. He proceeds along the course theoretically
mapped out at the inception of his literary life, never deviating from
this narrow way till the very end--till the time when, in his old age,
he wrote that exquisite pastoral, _The Sad Shepherd_, which is so
complete and absolute a denial of all his lifelong principles. But _The
Sad Shepherd_ is a weakness, albeit a triumphant weakness. Ben, as he
liked to look upon himself, as he has again and again revealed himself
to us, is the artist with principles, protesting against the anarchic
absence of principle among the geniuses and charlatans, the poets and
ranters of his age.
"The true artificer will not run away from nature as he were afraid
of her: or depart from life and the likeness of truth; but speak to
the capacity of his hearers. And though his language differ from
the vulgar somewhat, it shall not fly from all humanity, with the
Tamerlanes and Tamer-Chams of the late age, which had nothing in them
but the scenical strutting and furious vociferation to warrant them
to the ignorant gapers. He knows it is his only art, so to carry it
as none but artificers perceive it. In the meantime, perhaps, he is
called barren, dull, lean, a poor writer, or by what contumelious
word can come in their cheeks, by these men who without labour,
judgment, knowledge, or almost sense, are received or preferred
before him."
In these sentences from _Discoveries_ Ben Jonson paints his own
picture--portrait of the artist as a true artificer--setting forth,
in its most general form, and with no distracting details of the
humours or the moral purpose of art, his own theory of the artist's
true function and nature. Jonson's theory was no idle speculation, no
mere thing of words and air, but a creed, a principle, a categorical
imperative, conditioning and informing his whole work. Any study of the
poet must, therefore, begin with the formulation of his theory, and
must go on, as Professor Gregory Smith's excellent essay does indeed
proceed, to show in detail how the theory was applied and worked out in
each individual composition.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account