The London Mercury, Vol. I, Nos. 1-6, November 1919 to April 1920Various
General
The London Mercury, Vol. I, Nos. 1-6, November 1919 to April 1920
Various
English literature -- Periodicals; London (England) -- Periodicals
It will be asked if Mr. Edgar Lee Masters has not also the distinction
of having dared to tell the truth in a land where, whenever truth
shows itself, public opinion is instantly on the alert to suppress it.
Does not the author of the _Spoon River Anthology_ expose, powerfully
and memorably, the vices of the respectable provincial bourgeois, the
"Pillars of Society"? But again the question may be raised--did the
_Spoon River Anthology_ enjoy its vogue on account of its power and
distinction as a work of art, or on account of the unusualness that
lay in the subjection of American material to treatment of the kind?
Guy de Maupassant had, long since, the same idea as Mr. Edgar Lee
Masters, and de Maupassant executed it with genius. If a European,
coming after de Maupassant, after Ibsen, had written such an Anthology
from, say, the Potteries, with so much less than de Maupassant's or
Ibsen's power, would his work have made any noticeable impression?
Time will show--indeed it has done much to show already--how much less
formidable Mr. Masters's power is. And how unfortunate that, induced by
the success of _Spoon River_, Mr. Masters should have committed himself
to other verse--rhymed verse, schoolboy exercises limping after models,
otiose in expression, commonplace in thought. Mr. Masters writes in
America: there is nothing to keep him back.
Mr. Dreiser, it is true, has never done anything quite so deplorable as
the later verse of Mr. Masters: the tendencies of the author of _The
Titan_ and _The Genius_ go another way. Intrigued by the fantasies of
pseudo-scientific speculation he has of late taken to writing queerly
and embarrassingly juvenile plays and stories about "energies" that
form the subject-matter of Physics: he makes ponderous Teutonic play
with electrons and the like. Or, stung by the crass persecution of
American Puritanism, he writes grimly and solemnly and staidly about
lust, turning pornographer out of a quaint and harassed sense of
moral duty, or, it may be, merely out of obstinate combativeness,
under impulse to retaliation. Mr. Dreiser is at least a phenomenon of
psychological interest.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account