The worker-bee to-day is an over-intellectual, neurotic, morbidly dutiful
creature, while the drone is admittedly nothing but a stupid, happy,
sensual lout. If the extreme difference between the sexes in bee-life
had been aboriginal, the relations of drone and worker, as we see them in
the hives to-day, would be meet and reasonable enough; but there seems to
be clear evidence that, far back in the life of the race, the female bee
was not so hopelessly superior to her mate. The queen-bee, in all
likelihood, fairly represents the mother-bee as she was before the
cooling crust of the earth made some sort of protected habitation
necessary, which led first to close clustering for mutual warmth, and
then gradually developed the complicated hive-life of to-day. But
evolution will hardly account for all that we see: revolution must have
had its part in the production of the modern self-unsexed worker. It has
been seen that there is no physiological reason why each worker in the
hive should not have grown into the fertile mother of thousands. The
workers are not a stunted, specialised race, slowly evolved by time and
necessity, and procreating their own stunted kind; but each worker is
deliberately manufactured to a set pattern by the authorities in the
hive, obedient to the call of the State. And when did the female bees
begin this tampering with the springs of life, this improving upon
Creation, which was the first vital step, failing which the present
bee-commonwealth had been impossible? It looks very like a superb act of
generalship in the great primæval war of sex—a brilliant piece of
strategy that gave victory at a blow, and rendered the after-steps in the
scheme of conquest a matter of logical sequence.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account