But, in all likelihood, the true reason why the queen sleeps in a short
gown made of tough, coarse fibre must be looked for somewhere back in the
old ancestral history of the honey-bee. It is probably safe to consider
the complete worker cocoon as a comparatively recent introduction,
evolved to meet some necessity arising since the bee-people became a
civilised race. But what its true origin was appears to be out of the
reach of all conjecture. A curious fact is that these cocoons are never
removed from the cell. They remain fixed to its sides throughout, and
though the cell is otherwise carefully cleaned after the young bee has
vacated it, the cocoon is never interfered with, but continues as a
permanent lining to the cell. The same thing occurs with all successive
generations, each bee leaving her swaddling-clothes behind her, until so
great an accumulation occurs that the cell becomes too small for breeding
any but a puny, undersized race. With wild bees, where the nest has been
constructed in a tree-hollow, and there is usually plenty of surplus
room, the old brood-combs may be eventually abandoned and fresh ones
built farther on. Thus the stock generally shifts its station from year
to year. These natural bee-nests, or bee-bikes, as country people call
them, often reach a great age. Sometimes a swarm will get under the
rafters in a house-roof, and may be left undisturbed for generations. In
one case bees were traditionally supposed to have inhabited a blind loft
in a farmhouse continuously for forty or fifty years. A legend rife in
the village credited them with having stored many tons of honey, but when
the stock was sulphured little more than a vast accumulation of comb was
discovered. This comb was of all ages, from a few weeks old to an
unconjecturable number of years. Much of it was perfectly black, and the
cells choked up with pupa cocoons.
The fact that egg-laying is continued in these combs where others are not
available, even though the capacity of the cells has been greatly
reduced, seems to cast an added doubt on the theory that the size of the
cell is responsible for the fertilisation or non-fertilisation of the egg
as it is deposited by the queen. Very old drone-comb is sometimes found
in use for breeding purposes where the cells have become no larger than
those used for normal worker-brood. And yet the queen continues to lay
in them unimpregnated eggs. The whole question is still hedged round
with difficulties.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account