The Lost and Hostile Gospels: An Essay on the Toledoth Jeschu, and the Petrine and Pauline Gospels of the First Three Centuries of Which Fragments RemainBaring-Gould, S. (Sabine)
History
The Lost and Hostile Gospels: An Essay on the Toledoth Jeschu, and the Petrine and Pauline Gospels of the First Three Centuries of Which Fragments Remain
Baring-Gould, S. (Sabine)
Apocryphal Gospels
Matt. vii. 6, “Give not that which is holy to dogs, neither cast ye your
pearls before swine.” The word “holy,” τὸ ἅγιον, is a misinterpretation of
the Aramaic קרשא, a gold jewel for the ear, head or neck.(264) The
translator mistook the word for קורשא, or קרשא without ו “the holy.” The
sentence in the original therefore ran, “Give not a gold jewel to dogs,
neither cast pearls before swine.”
Matt. v. 37, “Let your conversation be Yea, yea, Nay, nay.” This is
meaningless. But if we restore the construction in Aramaic we have יהןא
לכם הן הן, לאו לאו, and the meaning is, “In your conversation let your yea
be yea, and your nay be nay.” The yea, yea, and nay, nay, in the Hebrew
come together, and this misled the translator. St. James quotes the saying
rightly (v. 12), “Let your yea be yea, and your nay, nay; lest ye fall
into condemnation.” It is a form of a Rabbinic maxim, “The yea of the
righteous is yea, and their nay is nay.” It is an injunction to speak the
truth.
We have therefore good grounds for our conjecture that St. Matthew’s
genuine “Sayings of the Lord” form a part of the Canonical Gospel.
We have next to consider, Whence came the rest of the material, the record
of the “doings of the Lord,” which the compiler interwove with the
“Sayings”?
We have tolerably convincing evidence that the compiler placed under
contribution both Aramaic and Greek collections.
For the citations from the Old Testament are not taken exclusively from
the Hebrew Scriptures, nor from the Greek translation of the Seventy; but
some are taken from the Greek translation, and some are taken from the
Hebrew, or from a Syro‐Chaldaean Targum or Paraphrase, probably in use at
the time.
Matt. i. 23, “A virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son.”
This is quoted as a prophecy of the miraculous conception. But it is only
a prophecy in the version of the LXX., which renders the Hebrew word
παρθένος, “virgin.” The Hebrew word does not mean virgin exclusively, but
“a young woman.” We may therefore conclude that verses 22, 23, were
additions by the Greek compiler of the Gospel, unacquainted with the
original Hebrew text.
Matt. ii. 15, “Out of Egypt have I called my son.” This is quoted
literally from the Hebrew text. That of the LXX. has, “Out of Egypt have I
called my children,” τὰ τέκνα. This made the saying of Hosea no prophecy
of our Lord; consequently he who inserted this reference can have known
only the Hebrew text, and not the Greek version. But in ii. 18, the
compiler follows the LXX. And again, ii. 23, “He shall be called a
Nazarene,” Ναζωραῖος. The Hebrew is כזר of which Ναζωραῖος is no
translation. The LXX. have Ναζιραῖος. The compiler was caught by the
similarity of sounds.
Matt. iii. 3. Here the construction of the LXX. is followed, which unites
“in the wilderness” with “the voice of one crying.” The Hebrew was
therefore not known by the compiler.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account