The Lost and Hostile Gospels: An Essay on the Toledoth Jeschu, and the Petrine and Pauline Gospels of the First Three Centuries of Which Fragments RemainBaring-Gould, S. (Sabine)
History
The Lost and Hostile Gospels: An Essay on the Toledoth Jeschu, and the Petrine and Pauline Gospels of the First Three Centuries of Which Fragments Remain
Baring-Gould, S. (Sabine)
Apocryphal Gospels
The Toledoth Jeschu comes before us with a flourish of trumpets from
Voltaire. “Le Toledos Jeschu,” says he, “est le plus ancien écrit Juif,
qui nous ait été transmis contre notre religion. C’est une vie de Jesus
Christ, toute contraire à nos Saints Evangiles: elle parait être du
premier siècle, et même écrite avant les evangiles.”(102) A fair specimen
of reckless judgment on a matter of importance, without having taken the
trouble to examine the grounds on which it was made! Luther knew more of
it than did Voltaire, and put it in a very different place:—
“The proud evil spirit carries on all sorts of mockery in this
book. First he mocks God, the Creator of heaven and earth, and His
Son Jesus Christ, as you may see for yourself, if you believe as a
Christian that Christ is the Son of God. Next he mocks us, all
Christendom, in that we believe in such a Son of God. Thirdly, he
mocks his own fellow Jews, telling them such disgraceful, foolish,
senseless affairs, as of brazen dogs and cabbage‐stalks and such
like, enough to make all dogs bark themselves to death, if they
could understand it, at such a pack of idiotic, blustering,
raging, nonsensical fools. Is not that a masterpiece of mockery
which can thus mock all three at once? The fourth mockery is this,
that whoever wrote it has made a fool of himself, as we, thank
God, may see any day.”
Luther knew the book, and, translated it, or rather condensed it, in his
“Schem Hamphoras.”(103)
There are two versions of the Toledoth Jeschu, differing widely from one
another. The first was published by Wagenseil, of Altdorf, in 1681. The
second by Huldrich at Leyden in 1705. Neither can boast of an antiquity
greater than, at the outside, the twelfth century. It is difficult to say
with certainty which is the earlier of the two. Probably both came into
use about the same time; the second certainly in Germany, for it speaks of
Worms in the German empire.
According to the first, Jeschu (Jesus) was born in the year of the world
4671 (B.C. 910), in the reign of Alexander Jannaeus (B.C. 106‐79)! He was
the son of Joseph Pandira and Mary, a widow’s daughter, the sister of
Jehoshua, who was affianced to Jochanan, disciple of Simeon Ben Schetah;
and Jeschu became the pupil of the Rabbi Elchanan. Mary is of the tribe of
Juda.
According to the second, Jeschu was born in the reign of Herod the
Proselyte, and was the son of Mary, daughter of Calpus, and sister of
Simeon, son of Calpus, by Joseph Pandira, who carried her off from her
husband, Papus, son of Jehuda. Jeschu was brought up by Joshua, son of
Perachia, in the days of the illustrious Rabbi Akiba! Mary is of the tribe
of Benjamin.
The anachronisms of both accounts are so gross as to prove that they were
drawn up at a very late date, and by Jews singularly ignorant of the
chronology of their history.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account