The lost Atlantis, and other ethnographic studiesWilson, Daniel, Sir
History
The lost Atlantis, and other ethnographic studies
Wilson, Daniel, Sir
America -- Antiquities; Atlantis (Legendary place); Ethnology -- America; Indians of North America -- Antiquities
When the Ohio valley was first explored it was uninhabited; and in the
latter part of the seventeenth century the whole region extending from
Lake Erie to the Tennessee river was an unpeopled desert. But the
Cherokees were in the occupation of their territory when first visited
by De Soto in 1540; and they are described by Bertram in 1773, with
their great council-house, capable of accommodating several hundreds,
erected on the summit of one of the large mounds, in their town of Cowe,
on the Tanase river, in Florida. But Bertram adds: “This mound on which
the rotunda stands, is of a much ancienter date than the building, and
perhaps was raised for another purpose. The Cherokees themselves are as
ignorant as we are by what people, or for what purpose, these artificial
hills were raised.”[66] It would, indeed, no more occur to those
wanderers into the deserted regions of the Mound-Builders to inquire
into the origin of their mounds, than into that of the Alleghany
Mountains.
If then it is probable that we thus recover some clue to the identity of
the vanished race of the Ohio valley, the very designation of the river
is a memorial of their supplanters. The Ohio is an Iroquois name given
to the river of the Alleghans by that indomitable race of savage
warriors who effectually counteracted the plans of France, under her
greatest monarchs, for the settlement of the New World. Their historian,
the late Hon. L. H. Morgan, remarks of the Iroquois: “They achieved for
themselves a more remarkable civil organisation, and acquired a higher
degree of influence, than any other race of Indian lineage except those
of Mexico and Peru. In the drama of European colonisation, they stood,
for nearly two centuries, with an unshaken front, against the
devastations of war, the blighting influence of foreign intercourse, and
the still more fatal encroachments of a restless and advancing border
population. Under their federal system, the Iroquois flourished in
independence, and capable of self-protection, long after the New England
and Virginia races had surrendered their jurisdictions, and fallen into
the condition of dependent nations; and they now stand forth upon the
canvas of Indian history, prominent alike for the wisdom of their civil
institutions, their sagacity in the administration of the league, and
their courage in its defence.”[67] But to characterise the elements of
combined action among the Six Nation Indians as wise civil institutions;
or to use such terms as league and federal system in the sense in which
they are employed by the historian of the Iroquois; is to suggest
associations that are illusory. With all the romance attached to the
League of the Hodenosauneega, they were to the last mere savages. When
the treaty which initiated the great league was entered into by its two
oldest members, the Mohawks and the Oneidas, the former claimed the name
of Kanienga, or “People of the Flint.” Whatever may have been the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account