The lost Atlantis, and other ethnographic studiesWilson, Daniel, Sir
History
The lost Atlantis, and other ethnographic studies
Wilson, Daniel, Sir
America -- Antiquities; Atlantis (Legendary place); Ethnology -- America; Indians of North America -- Antiquities
In previous remarks on the main subject of this paper, the development
of the artistic faculty has been noted as, in many cases, an exceptional
manifestation of intellectual activity, alike in ancient and modern
barbarous races. The striking contrast between the richly fluent forms
of the language, and the infantile condition of this people in relation
to so much else, including metallurgy, and the application of the arts
generally to the practical requirements of life, furnishes a no less
interesting illustration of intellectual development fostered by special
influences in another direction. The habitual practice of oratory made
the Iroquois acute reasoners; and their language abounds in abstract
terms to a degree altogether surprising in an uncivilised race. The
purposes of the rhetorician also encouraged the tropical use of literal
terms. It is not, therefore, difficult to understand how the primary
sense of the verb “to track” or “trace out” should ultimately yield the
meaning of “drawing” or “sketching,” and so finally of “painting.” On
the other hand, it abundantly coincides with the instinctive use of the
imitative faculty as a means of conveying definite ideas to others, that
in the Iroquois, as in other languages, the same terms are used to
express the idea of making a mark, drawing, or writing. The primitive
hieroglyphics, from whence our phonetic alphabets have come, were first
literal drawings, and then their abbreviations employed to express
associated ideas. An ideographic purpose appears to underlie the
earliest efforts of imitative art.
-----
[79] _Essai sur les déformations artificielles du Crâne_, p. 74.
[80] _Crania Britannica_, vi. Pl. 15; xiv. Pl. 12; xxxii. Pl. 42.
[81] Vide _Prehistoric Annals of Scotland_, 2d ed. i. 495.
[82] _Trans. Ethnol. Soc._, N.S. iii. 227.
[83] _Prehistoric Annals of Scotland_, i. 495.
[84] _I.e._ the Island of Santa Barbara. See “Remarks on Aboriginal
Art,” in _Proc. Davenport Acad. Nat. Science_, iv. 121.
[85] “The Right Hand:” _Left-handedness_, pp. 35, 37.
[86] _Proc. Soc. Antiq. Scot._, ix. 297, 301.
[87] Vide _Prehistoric Man_, 3rd ed. ii. 54.
[88] _Narrative of a Voyage to the Pacific_, i. 241.
[89] _Trans. Anthropol. Soc. Washington_, ii. 140.
[90] _Marchand’s Voyages_, ii. 282.
[91] _Remarks on Aboriginal Art in California and Queen Charlotte
Islands_, p. 118.
[92] _The Lenape Stone: or the Indian and the Mammoth_, by H. C. Mercer.
New York, 1885, pp. 5, 17.
[93] _Hommes fossiles et Hommes sauvages_, p. 49.
[94] _Hommes fossiles_, etc., p. 46.
[95] _Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge_, ii. 75.
[96] “Aboriginal Monuments,” etc., p. 76.
[97] _Proceedings of Hamilton Association_, i. 54.
[98] _Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge_, xxii. 82.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account