The lost Atlantis, and other ethnographic studiesWilson, Daniel, Sir
History
The lost Atlantis, and other ethnographic studies
Wilson, Daniel, Sir
America -- Antiquities; Atlantis (Legendary place); Ethnology -- America; Indians of North America -- Antiquities
Such information as can thus be gleaned from a variety of independent
sources, as from the somewhat confused yet trustworthy narrative of
David Cusick, the Tuscarora historian, and from Peter Dooyentate, the
Wyandot historian, all leads to the same conclusion. From remote and
altogether pre-Columbian centuries, the Hurons and other allied
tribes—the occupants in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries of
various detached portions of the country north of the St. Lawrence and
eastward of the Georgian Bay,—appear to have been in possession of the
whole region to which their oldest traditions pointed as the cradle of
the race; while nations of the Algonkin stock lay beyond them to the
north-west. The great river and the lakes from whence it flows into the
lower valley formed a well-defined southern boundary for affiliated
tribes; but the first Dutch and English explorers of the Hudson, and of
the tract of country which now constitutes the western part of the State
of New York, found the river-valleys and lake shores in occupation of
the Iroquois confederacy, then consisting of Mohawks, Oneidas,
Onondagas, Cayugas and Senecas. These constituted the five nations of
the famous Iroquois league. But the Hurons of Canada, with whom they
were latterly at deadly feud, appear to have been the oldest
representatives of the common race, and were still in occupation of
their ancestral home when Cartier first explored the St. Lawrence. The
same race had spread far to the south; and its representatives, in
detached groups, long continued to perpetuate its influence. These
included the Conestogas or Andastes, the Andastogues, the Carantouans,
the Cherohakahs or Nottoways, the Tuscaroras, and others, under various
names. It is not always easy to recognise the same tribe under its
widely dissimilar designations. The Susquehannocks of the English and
the Minquas of the Dutch, appear to be the Andastes under other
designations, and Champlain’s Carantouans may have been the Eries. Under
those and other names the Huron-Iroquois stock extended to the country
of the Tuscaroras in North Carolina. Still farther south Gallatin
surmised, from linguistic evidence, a connection between the Cherokees
and the Iroquois.[115] This fact Mr. Hale has placed beyond doubt; and
having detected in the language of the former a grammatical structure
mainly Huron-Iroquois, while the vocabulary is to a great extent
foreign, he is inclined to think that we thus recover traces of a
people, far south in Alabama and Georgia, the descendants of refugees of
the conquered Alligéwi, adopted into one of the nations of their
Iroquois conquerors.[116]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account