The lost Atlantis, and other ethnographic studiesWilson, Daniel, Sir
History
The lost Atlantis, and other ethnographic studies
Wilson, Daniel, Sir
America -- Antiquities; Atlantis (Legendary place); Ethnology -- America; Indians of North America -- Antiquities
But this, far from being a proof of a high state of
civilisation, rather showed that the various races of America had never
submitted for any length of time to a powerful political
concentration.[131] The Iroquois were undoubtedly pre-eminent in the
highest virtues of the savage; and could they have been isolated in the
critical transitional stage, like the ancient Egyptians in their Nile
valley, the Greeks in their Hellenic peninsula, or the Anglo-Saxons in
their insular stronghold—
. . . . set in the silver sea
Which serves it in the office of a wall
Or as a moat defensive—
until they learned to unite with their courage and persistency in war
some of the elements of progress in civilisation ascribed to them, they
might have proved the regenerators of the continent, and reserved it for
permanent occupation by races of native origin. “Wherever they went,”
says Schoolcraft, “they carried proofs of their energy, courage, and
enterprise. At one period we hear the sound of their war-cry along the
Straits of the St. Mary’s, and at the foot of Lake Superior; at another,
under the walls of Quebec, where they finally defeated the Hurons under
the eyes of the French.”[132] And after glancing at the long history of
their triumphs, he adds: “Nations trembled when they heard the name of
the Konoshioni.”
In older centuries, while the Huron-Iroquois still constituted one
united people in their ancestral home to the north of the St. Lawrence,
they must have been liable to contact with the Eskimo, both on the north
and the east; and greatly as the two races differ, the dolichocephalic
type of head common to both is not only suggestive of possible
intermixture, but also of encroachments on the Eskimo in early centuries
by this aggressive race. In the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, as
probably at a much earlier date, when the Iroquois had parted from the
Hurons, they became unquestionably _the_ aggressive race of the northern
continent; and were an object of dread to widely severed nations. Their
earliest foes were probably the Algonkins, whose original home appears
to have been between Lake Superior and Hudson Bay. Nevertheless, there
was a time, according to the traditions of both, apparently in some old
pre-Columbian century, when Iroquois and Algonkins combined their forces
against the long-extinct stock whose name survives in that of the
Alleghany Mountains and river. But if so, their numbers must have then
vastly exceeded that of their whole combined nations at any period
subsequent to their first intercourse with Europeans. For if the growing
opinion is correct that the Alligéwi were the so-called “Mound-Builders”
of the Mississippi and Ohio valleys, they must have been a numerous
people, occupying a territory of great extent, and carrying on
agriculture on a large scale. So far as metallurgy—that crucial test of
civilisation,—is concerned, they had not advanced beyond the stage of
Iroquois progress.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account